[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
I confirm the fix with kernel 2.6.37-8 #21 Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING]

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-10 Thread Andy Whitcroft
There is a patch in the latest Natty kernel (post alpha-1) which fixes some initialisation issues. Could you test that kernel and report back herre. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel Källming
2.6.37-8 #21-Ubuntu SMP seems to manage to start x correctly on every boot, for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ --

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-08 Thread Kate Stewart
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
X Starts correctly in failsafe mode however the following error is displayed in the X.log: FBDEV(0): FBIOPUTCMAP: Invalid argument -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title:

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Another discovery, this only happens on cold start. If I power on the netbook and boot directly to a normal session, the screen is black If I boot to recovery mode and select failsafe X, wait for X to start, then do a warm restart and choose the normal X session, then X starts just fine. This

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-02 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Interestingly enough, X starts correctly with 2.6.37-7 #19-ubuntu when booted from a LiveCD, but doesn't work when the system is installed. Reported also on a Dell Mini9 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-02 Thread Daniel Källming
Apparently still black screens sometimes on the atom machine (hp mini 5101) with 2.6.37-7-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 Title: [STAGING] X doesn't

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-01 Thread Jeremy Foshee
Hi Jean-Baptiste, If you could also please test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-12-01 Thread Daniel Källming
Hi, I had the same problem with the same kernels on an atom-based machine with Intel gfx, but after some update today to 2.6.37-7 (I have not tested any mainline kernel) X starts normally again. -- [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681294 You received this

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+

2010-11-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
2.6.36-7 is broken too. I confirm that the system is not dead because I can ssh into it. Let me know which useful information I can collect while the system is in this state. ** Summary changed: - [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6 + [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6+ **

[Bug 681294] Re: [STAGING] X doesn't start with 2.6.37-6

2010-11-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Description changed: Last known good version: 2.6.37-5 Steps to reproduce: Boot with 2.6.37-6 The system boots correctly but X doesn't start. The screen changes from 'Aubergine' to completely 'black' when switching from plymouth to gdm. - The system doesn't seems completely