[Bug 683687] Re: linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade

2011-01-05 Thread Tim Gardner
You guys should be using meta packages to track the kernel and its headers, e.g., linux-image-generic and linux-headers-generic. Why these weren't installed in the first place seems like an installer bug. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug

[Bug 683687] Re: linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade

2010-12-20 Thread epimeth
The exact same thing just happened to me again just now when updating to 2.6.35-24... If it helps, here's the tail of apt's history.log Start-Date: 2010-12-20 10:01:09 Install: linux-image-2.6.35-24-generic:amd64 (2.6.35-24.42) Upgrade: linux-generic:amd64 (2.6.35.23.25, 2.6.35.24.28),

[Bug 683687] Re: linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade

2010-12-08 Thread Jeremy Foshee
** Tags added: kernel-series-unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683687 Title: linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 683687] Re: linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade

2010-12-01 Thread epimeth
-- linux-headers not included in 2.6.35-23 upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com