[Bug 689100] Re: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API

2010-12-18 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689100 Title: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API -- u

[Bug 689100] Re: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API

2010-12-12 Thread Michael Bienia
Any ideas how to improve it to make it easier for use? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689100 Title: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 689100] Re: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API

2010-12-12 Thread Stefano Rivera
> But what you mean with "homegrown launchpad api wrapper"? I say that because its api is rather different to launchpadlib. I wanted to use some of its convenience functions in other u-d-t tools, but there was no trivial way to do that without fully switching to lpapicache. BTW the code also give

[Bug 689100] Re: [requestsync] Unnecessarily complicated to use LP API

2010-12-12 Thread Michael Bienia
I agree that we should get rid of manage-credentials (see also bug 387297) and that we could make the LP API default if there is a consensus for it. But what you mean with "homegrown launchpad api wrapper"? ubuntutools/lp/lpapicache.py? That's relatively new to speed up requestsync. It caches ob