[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-08-09 Thread Peter Matulis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 298217 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298217 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 773284 gksu behavior on bad password ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 298217 no second attempt and no feedback when wrong password entered -- Y

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-06-01 Thread Robert Roth
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773284 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773284 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #773284, so it is being marked as such. Please look a

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-04-29 Thread Robert Roth
This seems to be related to bug #604197. The best would be to fix this in gksu, to show the gksu window until the password is either correct or the dialog is cancelled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-04-21 Thread Eliah Kagan
That reasoning makes good sense to me; I have no objection to it. (In any case, your accompanying comment clarifies the meaning of this bug's architecture-tagless state, so while some bugs are reported without tags because the original reporters--typically not using apport--didn't supply architectu

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-04-21 Thread Robert Roth
I don't know what's the right thing to do, but as far as I understood, tags are for restricting the environment in which a bug occurs. I have checked the code, and this is not fixed, so it does occur on every possible architecture - so if we want to add architecture tags, we should add all of those

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-04-21 Thread Eliah Kagan
@Robert Shouldn't this be tagged with *both* amd64 and i386 now, rather than neither? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689180 Title: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2011-04-21 Thread Robert Roth
I have reproduced this on Maverick, with i386, with update-manager 0.142.23, thus I am removing the amd64 tag. ** Tags removed: amd64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689180 Title: upd

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2010-12-22 Thread Charlie Kravetz
Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. I can confirm this issue using Xubuntu Natty 64bit. When Settings is clicked and the pas

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2010-12-11 Thread Eliah Kagan
I have just tried to reproduce this bug on a Maverick i386 system, and was unable to do so. While I suppose it's possible that this occurs only on amd64, it seems more likely that there's some other important factor. Both systems do have the same package versions for update-manager, as well as for

[Bug 689180] Re: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure

2010-12-11 Thread Eliah Kagan
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689180 Title: update-manager doesn't report authentication failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/