** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd
This bug was fixed in the package multipath-tools -
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2
---
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2) lucid-proposed; urgency=high
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #690387)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Thu,
This bug was fixed in the package multipath-tools -
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2
---
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2) maverick-proposed; urgency=high
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #690387)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd kref release cycle
To
This bug was fixed in the package multipath-tools -
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2
---
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2) lucid-proposed; urgency=high
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #690387)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Thu,
This bug was fixed in the package multipath-tools -
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2
---
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2) maverick-proposed; urgency=high
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #690387)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
I reproduced the bug and can confirm the fix for lucid. Doing the same on
maverick now.
Hardware for the test is:
HBA: QLogic Corp. ISP2312-based 2Gb Fibre Channel to PCI-X HBA
SAN: HP EVA3000
Connected with two different path directly between the QLogic and the
SAN.
--
You received this bug
Just confirmed the same behavior with maverick.
Devices disappeared and reappeared with the same name.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev
I reproduced the bug and can confirm the fix for lucid. Doing the same on
maverick now.
Hardware for the test is:
HBA: QLogic Corp. ISP2312-based 2Gb Fibre Channel to PCI-X HBA
SAN: HP EVA3000
Connected with two different path directly between the QLogic and the
SAN.
--
You received this bug
Just confirmed the same behavior with maverick.
Devices disappeared and reappeared with the same name.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected,
Accepted multipath-tools into maverick-proposed, the package will build
now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick-proposed/multipath-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd kref
@Clint
lucid-proposed looks good.
$ apt-cache showpkg multipath-tools
Package: multipath-tools
Versions:
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-proposed_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
# multipath -ll
222fb00015553d0d9dm-3
@Clint
maverick-proposed looks good.
# apt-cache showpkg multipath-tools
Package: multipath-tools
Versions:
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_maverick-proposed_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
# multipath -ll
Awesome, thanks Peter.
Now, we need somebody who wasn't involved in creating the fix to verify
the fix, or at least verify that the package itself works without
regressions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected,
Accepted multipath-tools into maverick-proposed, the package will build
now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick-proposed/multipath-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd kref release cycle
To manage
@Clint
lucid-proposed looks good.
$ apt-cache showpkg multipath-tools
Package: multipath-tools
Versions:
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.04.2
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid-proposed_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
# multipath -ll
222fb00015553d0d9dm-3
@Clint
maverick-proposed looks good.
# apt-cache showpkg multipath-tools
Package: multipath-tools
Versions:
0.4.8-14ubuntu4.10.10.2
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_maverick-proposed_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
# multipath -ll
Awesome, thanks Peter.
Now, we need somebody who wasn't involved in creating the fix to verify
the fix, or at least verify that the package itself works without
regressions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Serge
Yes, fix-released for oneiric
I believe natty is covered.
The confusion I think is the changelog references this fix from a
private bug:
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu7) natty; urgency=low
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #660597)
Where this
Thanks, Peter. I'll follow up on this bug.
The mass SRU failed. Any high priority bugs not yet SRUd should be
separately handled. Several of the bugs which were part of the mass SRU
were not listed as high priority. If anyone feels they *are* high
priority, then pls comment in the bugs to
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: multipath-tools
+
+
+ SRU Justification:
+ 1. Impact: multipath fail-over events are not handled by multipathd. The
system therefore does not cleanly survive FOFB.
+ 2. How addressed:
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
@Serge
Yes, fix-released for oneiric
I believe natty is covered.
The confusion I think is the changelog references this fix from a
private bug:
multipath-tools (0.4.8-14ubuntu7) natty; urgency=low
* Add patch to fix the expected pathname from multipath uevents
(LP: #660597)
Where this
Thanks, Peter. I'll follow up on this bug.
The mass SRU failed. Any high priority bugs not yet SRUd should be
separately handled. Several of the bugs which were part of the mass SRU
were not listed as high priority. If anyone feels they *are* high
priority, then pls comment in the bugs to
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: multipath-tools
+
+
+ SRU Justification:
+ 1. Impact: multipath fail-over events are not handled by multipathd. The
system therefore does not cleanly survive FOFB.
+ 2. How addressed:
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Peter,
I seem to have lost track of what we were doing with this bug.
Is it safe to assume that this is fix released in oneiric?
Do we need to SRU the patch to lucid and natty?
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
Hi Peter,
I seem to have lost track of what we were doing with this bug.
Is it safe to assume that this is fix released in oneiric?
Do we need to SRU the patch to lucid and natty?
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd kref release cycle
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690387
Title:
udev block naming breaks failover and sd kref release cycle
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Patch added: 0001-Fix-for-uevent-devpath-handling.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/690387/+attachment/1766245/+files/0001-Fix-for-uevent-devpath-handling.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: multipath-tools
- This was exposed on the Intel IMS SAN which is an ODM'd Promise Vtrak variant
- on 10.04 server. The SAN has Active/Standby capabilities and is configured
for failover.
- It probably affects other SANs too.
+ This was exposed on
** Patch added: 0001-Fix-for-uevent-devpath-handling.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/690387/+attachment/1766245/+files/0001-Fix-for-uevent-devpath-handling.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: multipath-tools
- This was exposed on the Intel IMS SAN which is an ODM'd Promise Vtrak variant
- on 10.04 server. The SAN has Active/Standby capabilities and is configured
for failover.
- It probably affects other SANs too.
+ This was exposed on
40 matches
Mail list logo
