[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2013-10-30 Thread Jon Bernard
** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jon Bernard (jbernard) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594 Title: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default

Re: [Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2012-03-05 Thread Serge Hallyn
> You're absolutely right, I will allocate time this week to put together > a new upstream release. > > Serge, would have have time to help me test and provide feedback? I will be out the remainder of this week. I can test it next week though. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2012-03-04 Thread Jon Bernard
You're absolutely right, I will allocate time this week to put together a new upstream release. Serge, would have have time to help me test and provide feedback? Jon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

Re: [Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2012-03-03 Thread Serge Hallyn
Jon, if you could do these soon in the Debian package, I think we should still be able to get it into precise. Rioting_Pacifst, note that we generally recommend using cgroup-lite when possible. Quoting Rioting_Pacifst (693...@bugs.launchpad.net): > This bug has quite a few nasty symptoms (break

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2012-03-03 Thread Rioting_Pacifst
This bug has quite a few nasty symptoms (breaks suspend on SMP machines, etc) and I guess cgroups are going to get more popular as people try the "superpatch" so could we get one of the following into 12.04 please: 1)do not move all tasks into a default cgroup comment CREATE_DEFAULT=yes out and u

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-06-26 Thread steubens
a related issue with moving kernel threads is that one of them also breaks suspend :] it was fun to figure out! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594 Title: cgroup-bin should not move

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-06-23 Thread AlainKnaff
This problem also happens in lucid (which is supposed to be an LTS release). Please fix this ASAP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594 Title: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-04-25 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi, the core of this bug appears to be fixed in natty's newest libcgroup version (0.37.1-1ubuntu2). It no longer moves tasks into a default cgroup. I'm undecided as to whether to call that fixing this bug. I assume that changing the config files to set a default cgroup other than / will still c

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-04-22 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594 Title: cgro

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-01-24 Thread fnu
Ok, I tried it one my little Lucid@virtualbox (1 CPU & 512MB defined) and well, it works. Just put a "echo 95 > /cgroups/cpu/sysdefault/cpu.rt_runtime_us" into "/etc/rc.local" and it is possible to load and unload kernel modules. Since I don't know how this works against cgroup at all, I would

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-01-24 Thread Nelson Elhage
> "rt_runtime_us" is a adjustable value rather than a boolean, right? Right. In particular, it is the number of microseconds out of every second that a process scheduled with realtime priority is allowed to run for if it doesn't voluntarily yield the CPU, or something like that. -- You received

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-01-24 Thread fnu
Hey, thx for the reply. Since I also ran in the problem on a VDR. In case of failure, VDR is covered by a watchdog, which tries do unload DVB modules. with cgroup- bin on Lucid, this ends in stop application, since rmmod does never come back. In the meantime I'm strongly interested in a workaroun

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-01-24 Thread Nelson Elhage
Yes, enabling real-time scheduling for sysdefault would also fix this. Although you probably want something like rt_runtime_us = 95, which is the default without any cgroups. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 693594] Re: cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd into a default cgroup

2011-01-22 Thread fnu
Would it make sense to enable the real time scheduler for the [sys]default process group [rt_runtime_us = 1]? At least as a kind of workaround ... ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594