** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick-proposed/bzr
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Accepted bzr into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Also affects: bzr (Ubuntu Maverick)
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/maverick/bzr/sru-2.2.4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/maverick/bzr/proposed-2.2.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/bzr
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
Fixed in natty for now.
Bazaar Maintainers: Please drop the ubuntu changes in the bzr package
when the python 2.7 transitional issues get fixed upstream.
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Loïc Minier (lool) => Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar)
--
You received this bug notification becau
This bug finally gets fixed for good in the -1ubuntu3 upload:
bzr (2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* Revert back to 2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1 as it's not just the readline() issue
causing problems, but bzr will corrupt .bzr dirs with python 2.7, see
LP #654731.
* Really use python
This bug was fixed in the package bzr - 2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu2
---
bzr (2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low
* Revert changes from 2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1 as they don't fix the build.
* New patch, fix-readline-python2.7, from
https://code.launchpad.net/~vila/bzr/2.2-693880-ssl-
** Patch removed: "Improved debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/bzr/+bug/693880/+attachment/1782573/+files/check.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
T
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
** Patch added: "Correct debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/bzr/+bug/693880/+attachment/1782700/+files/check.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Tit
Setting back to confirmed.
It appears that the change which I made gets overridden when the bzr
script goes into /usr/bin/ . I am working on this one, and will upload
another debdiff in a matter of minutes.
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You receiv
This is still an issue for me wtih 2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1:
ii bzr2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1
easy to use distributed version control system
bzr branch lp:xyz
bzr: ERROR: exceptions.TypeError: readline() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
Trac
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/bzr
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
This bug was fixed in the package bzr - 2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1
---
bzr (2.3.0~beta3-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* Force usage of python2.6 both while building and when the bzr command
is executed. This is a temporary change to fix issues caused in bzr
due to the python 2.7 tr
Thanks Bilal! I'll sponsor this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
This 'workaround' fix works, just tested on natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
This debdiff forces the use of Python 2.6 both while building the bzrlib
and also modifies the /usr/bin/bzr command to ALWAYS use python2.6 .
This temporarily fix fixes the problem of selftests and other issues
such as this one which came up after the python 2.7 transition.
This patch needs to be
The build of this debdiff actually works on both i386 and amd64, and the
selftests run well.
https://launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/+archive/stage/+build/2121868
https://launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/+archive/stage/+build/2121867
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Also affects: bzr (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Critical
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
Unsubscribed sponsors for now, as we need to resolve the issues detected
by selftest first, before we move to fixing this bug.
In the meantime this is a workaround to run bazaar (force usage of
python 2.6):
python2.6 `which bzr` branch lp:foo
Replace branch lp:foo with the command you want to ru
Aha, amd64 built fine, but i386 which I was trying to build is FTBFS.
That's clear. I'd like to wait for patch which will build package also
on i386.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69388
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 12:54 +, Bilal Akhtar wrote:
> As for the successful build on amd64 about which I mentioned in comment #11,
> the build was:
> https://launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/+archive/stage/+build/2117223
That build doesn't seem to have run the Bazaar testsuite (anymore?),
which was w
As for the successful build on amd64 about which I mentioned in comment #11,
the build was:
https://launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/+archive/stage/+build/2117223
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
The problem is that selftest doesn't pass with Python 2.7, no? Fixes
have recently landed for bug 614595 and bug 637674, which leaves three
failures, one from bug 654731 and two from bug 654733.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
On 12/30/2010 01:54 PM, Artur Rona wrote:
> @Bilal Akhtar: My question is did you try to build it? Because on my
> natty is FTBFS. I was trying to build this patch some days ago.
>
It appears to build well on amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
@Bilal Akhtar: My question is did you try to build it? Because on my
natty is FTBFS. I was trying to build this patch some days ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_Repo
I applied vila's commit #5580 to lp:bzr in this debdiff. Would be good
if someone sponsored it.
** Patch added: "Debdiff against current natty version to fix this bug"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/693880/+attachment/1779387/+files/check.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification be
There is also experimental. However, I agree that we shouldn't handle
even with experimental if package couldn't build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSock
Unfortunately there are a couple of other problems that show up when
running the test suite with python 2.7. I'd like to wait for beta 5 (and
resolve the rest of there issues) before uploading anything to sid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Branch linked: lp:~debian-bazaar/bzr/unstable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** Also affects: bzr (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bu
I'm going to upload a package to sid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Fixed in bzr 2.3b5. We should upgrade it for Ubuntu or wait for Debian
response.
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Also affects: bzr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693880
Title:
_ReportingFileSocket.readline lacks size argument
--
ubuntu-bu
35 matches
Mail list logo
