This bug was fixed in the package mtdev - 1.1.0-0ubuntu1
---
mtdev (1.1.0-0ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
[ Henrik Rydberg ]
* New upstream release. (LP: #702537)
* Update library symbols.
[ Christopher James Halse Rogers ]
* Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining Ubuntu chang
I've merged the interesting Debian changes into this proposed package
and added the foo required to close this bug from the changelog.
http://cooperteam.net/Packages/mtdev_1.1.0-0ubuntu1_source.changes is
ready for sponsoring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Branch linked: lp:~raof/mtdev/merge-useful-debian-1.0.11-changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702537
Title:
Upload mtdev-1.1.0 to Ubuntu
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: mtdev (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: mtdev (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702537
Title:
Upload mtdev
As incomplete you can understand it as 'Needs information'.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702537
Title:
Upload mtdev-1.1.0 to Ubuntu
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
The rest of the utouch effort during natty will depend on mtdev-1.1.0
and any eventual fixes being available as soon as possible, so I
recommend against round-trip delays. Debian only recently caught up
with ubuntu regarding mtdev, so there is no inherent reason for this
package to be synced from
I'm going to merge mtdev first with Debian unstable, so we will get
1.0.11. What about getting 1.1.0 firstly in Debian?
** Changed in: mtdev (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
