*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 90575 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90575
[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
--
GRUB failed to install to (sda)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71099
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 90575 ***
Looks like this is mostly bug 90575 (lack of validation for grub
device), then.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 90575
MASTER: need further sanity checking on grub device names
--
GRUB failed to install to (sda)
https://launchpad.net
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 73825
Xubuntu installer
** Tags added: grub needsinfo
--
GRUB failed to install to (sda)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71099
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73825 ***
This sounds much like the 'bug' I found (I tried to find the bug report
number, but maybe it's closed and therefore I can not see it?). In the
end, with just a SATA HD in my system I installed GRUB, but
counterintuitively GRUB installed to 'hda'. I d
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73825 ***
I've seen the e-mail trail, and hope this isn't just an annoying duplicate,
but I tried different variations after I found the manpage on grub. All of
then resulted in the same error message. I can try again in a few days to
replicate the conditions i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73825 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 73825
Xubuntu installer
--
GRUB failed to install to (sda)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71099
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-b
Could you please attach /var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman to this
bug, by commenting on the bug's web page? Thanks in advance.
Did you literally tell GRUB to install to "(sda)"? That's not a valid
GRUB device name.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
