@paelzer: There was a plan to enable IPv6 on all pools last year:
https://community.ntppool.org/t/intention-to-enable-ipv6-by-default-
in-2017/91 To my knowledge (and based on my brief checks just now) this
didn't happen. I suspect the reasons for this are insufficient time to
change the pool imp
@Paul - I wondered do we converge onto providing ipv6 on all 4 ubuntu pool
addresses?
For bug 1754358 in chrony it would be really helpful to reach an optimal
default configuration if all ubuntu pools would provide ipv6.
I'm sure you know best what is planned (or could be done), so I'd be
happy
Additional hosts have been added to ntp.ubuntu.com today, including an
additional IPv6 address.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715141
Title:
Default NTP servers do not have recor
Both 2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org and ntp.ubuntu.com have records now.
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715141
Title:
D
[Expired for ntp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715141
Title:
Hi James,
thanks for the info, you are right the whois to the IP's I get are not owned by
Canonical.
But I wonder who set this up then - I'd have expected that we followed this
somewhen back in time to add the four Ubuntu servers to the pool:
http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/join.html
And I thought fo
ChristianEhrhardt <715...@bugs.launchpad.net> writes:
> Also the question at Canonical Sysadmins: Any plans/progress on enabling
> the other[013].ubuntu.pool.ntp.org as well?
We don't own or control $ANYTHING.pool.ntp.org AFAIK
--
James
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
A kind of "minimum working set" is available as ipv6 atm:
ntp.ubuntu.com
2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
And obviously also (ipv6.ntp.ubuntu.com)
The good thing is that this should get everything working:
- ntp will find an ipv6 at least on 2
- and ntpdate defaulting to ntp.ubuntu.com should work as wel
Also, ipv6.ntp.ubuntu.com is available if you prefer to force IPv6-only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715141
Title:
Default NTP servers do not have records
To manage notificat
One of our NTP servers has been IPv6 enabled today. The other will
follow as time permits.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715141
Title:
Default NTP servers do not have records
Canonical Sysadmins: I've noticed that archive.ubuntu.com has IPv6
addresses. Does this mean that you're now in a position to provide
ntp.ubuntu.com records also please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
We notice this here as well, as we're increasingly turning up new
services and VMs without IPv4. It fails with a rather cryptic error
message:
Jul 8 07:10:03 rpki-validator ntpdate[689]: Can't find host ntp.ubuntu.com:
Name or service not known (-2)
Jul 8 07:10:03 rpki-validator ntpdate[689]: n
I'm using 'systemd' to boot with Utopic. Recently ntpdate has failed. So
googling around i have found that:
- ntpdate is the default ubuntu-minimal choice, even if deprecated. Should use
ntp instead.
- the servers used (ntp.ubuntu.com) has issue with ipv6
- records default servers can be eas
13 matches
Mail list logo
