There are other docbook tags that are not emphasized in any way in yelp
and in the html docs. Also, there are other attributes that can be
added to the acronym tag, like ID, which would mean you could post a
direct link to it. Other viewers could display them differently in the
same way that you
If it is shown the same in the actual docs then i think it should be
kept unstyled in the html as well. But what i don't understand is what
is the reason for having the tag in there at all?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
OK, thanks for clarifying. The class is created automatically since
acronym is a docbook element, we just don't have a CSS class for it to
show in HTML. I can add one, but I'm not sure that we should given that
the "acronym" doesn't appear differently when viewing the documentation
in yelp anyway
Well it's not a direct violation of HTML, but normally you would use
to explain what the acronym stands for. On the Danish loco we
have the default style for be underlined and have a question
mark as the cursor, so this makes the "issue" more pronounced.
--
You received this bug notification be
** Summary changed:
- Acronums in hardware/disks dosn't explain what they are
+ Acronyms in hardware/disks doesn't explain what they are
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-docs
- FAT16, with out a title tag on that
- it is peaty useless.
+ FAT16, with out a title attribute
