Awesome, thanks Vincent. Presumably we'll file bugs and patches in
Debian directly, but to catch anything that falls through the cracks,
you're welcome to subscribe to the package's bugs in Ubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-c++/+subscribe
--
You received this bug notification bec
Hi,
Since a package I regularly use (gnote) depends on dbus-c++, I'd be
interested in maintaining it (or co-maintaining it, even). I'm also open
to the possibility of adopting the package upstream in Debian, but my
sponsor suggested that I start off with a QA upload instead; this was my
first pack
promoted
** Changed in: dbus-c++ (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730759
Title:
[MIR] b-d for libffado
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Reopening, as the package upload doesn't settle the MIR
promotion/approval.
** Changed in: dbus-c++ (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7307
This bug was fixed in the package dbus-c++ - 0~20110310-1ubuntu1
---
dbus-c++ (0~20110310-1ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* Merge with Debian (LP: #730759). Remaining changes:
- Add symbols files.
dbus-c++ (0~20110310-1) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Change maintainer
Looking at the changes at http://gitorious.org/dbus-
cplusplus/mainline/commits/master, these are mostly bug fixes, and look
appropriate for natty at this point, approved. Please do test this new
version against libffado, though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
this sounds promising. now Debian has an update, so I would suggest
merging this for natty (checked that it builds in natty, and that
libffado builds with the new version). Then maintenance can start with
the updated version.
subscribing ubuntu-release for the FFe for the new upstream version.
-
I'm willing to spend some time post-mid-May on it as part of ~ubuntu-
audio-dev.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730759
Title:
[MIR] b-d for libffado
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
So, moving dbus-c++ back to be bundled seems like a sleight of hand.
The problem here is that we have an unmaintained chunk of code in main.
It seems bad to approve it just because it happened to be there before
and we just didn't know it was unmaintained.
Could ubuntu-audio maintain it in Ubuntu?
The pkg-multimedia team do not want to take over maintainership of
dbus-c++, however I have been offered help to keep it maintained in
Debian, in terms of mentoring etc. I was hoping that a discussion would
have sprung up around the dependency on an unmaintained package,
particularly one that hasn'
Luke, no need to do a special upload for the GPL thing. Like I said, we
don't even distribute that example program.
The symbols seem fine now (though there is a bit of #MISSING cruft). So
the only remaining issue is maintenance in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Ok, the package now has symbols for all arches.
** Changed in: dbus-c++ (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730759
Title:
[MIR] b-d for lib
ftbfs on i386
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-c++/0~20090907-1ubuntu2
** Changed in: dbus-c++ (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Changed in: dbus-c++ (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730759
Title:
[MIR] b-d for libffado
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Having checked Debian and Ubuntu, there are only 2 packages using
dbus-c++, libffado included. Since libffado is likely going to be the
more actively developed package, I will contact the debian pkg-
multimedia team about possibly taking over maintainership in Debian. I
see it in their best interes
i have just became aware of this issue, and have subscribed to the
reports.. demoting this package is not really an option for
ubuntustudio... this would mean that out of the box, JACK would not have
firewire support... i will continue to do what i can to help resolve
this issue in a timely manner.
Some nitpicks:
* Would be nice to see an Ubuntu bug subscriber
* Patch 02_host_name_max.diff injects GPL-3+ code into an LGPL-2.1 example
program. Which is legal [1], but requires the program to be conveyed as
GPL-3+, which the patch does not actually do. This is an exceedingly minor
point,
- code was already in main as an internal copy in a superseded version
of the libffado package.
- again, it's an old snapshot, and maybe could use an update after
natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
18 matches
Mail list logo
