> > It would be completely
> > > inconsistent, illogical and simple "wrong".
> >
> > I don't think so: the launcher is used to create a new *window* for an
> > application or to bring the *window* of that application up. As far I
> know,
> > applications that does not have a window can not be pinne
2011/5/16 Marco Biscaro
> >
> > Why should the launcher suddenly hide "windows"?
>
> Again: because applications can not be hidden.
>
Exactly.
> It would be completely
> > inconsistent, illogical and simple "wrong".
>
> I don't think so: the launcher is used to create a new *window* for an
> a
>
> Why should the launcher suddenly hide "windows"?
Again: because applications can not be hidden.
> It would be completely
> inconsistent, illogical and simple "wrong".
I don't think so: the launcher is used to create a new *window* for an
application or to bring the *window* of that applicat
Marco Biscaro:
Maybe "minimize" was a poor choice, a better term to properly distinguish the
two approaches is "hide".
The launcher is for launching applications, it represents application,
it indicates whether applications are running or not, you can "quit"
applications from it's context menu.
