** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by
The bug is fixed in Oneiric popularity-contest version 1.53ubuntu1
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've updated related branch lp:~abone/ubuntu/natty/popularity-
contest/fix-742017 with popularity-contest from version 1.53, should be
enough to backport fix to Natty.
Binary package with the fixed vesion should be available soon in my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~abone/+archive/ubuntu-fixes
--
If 1.53ubuntu1 fixed this bug, is the bug linkage to Debian wrong? The
linked Debian bug #555790 is still open, whereas the changelog refers to
Debian bug #622322.
** Also affects: popularity-contest (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: popularity-contest
Bug linkage is ok. Debbug 555790 and debbug 622322 are both related to
multiarch. As far as I know, until version 1.53 popularity-contest
accessed to dkpg data directly to get list of files belonging to a
package. After introduction of multiarch in dpkg several bugs arrised.
Now popularity-contest
Unsubscribing Ubuntu Sponsors team since Steve Langasek has assigned
this to himself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings
will there be a fix for natty?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by multiarch
To manage notifications about this bug
Fixes for natty and oneiric are proposed for merging. Both request are
in pending state. Until then you may build package from a bzr branch. If
you wish I may try to publish fixed package in my ppa, but I never did
it before. :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Branch linked: lp:~abone/ubuntu/natty/popularity-
contest/fix-742017-oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES
If you don't mind, I will subscribe ubuntu sponsors to this bug. We have
a patch in works for me state and I've prepared it for merging into
natty/oneiric branch. I suppose, applying this patch is better than
current situation, where popcon loses all information about multiarch
packages.
** Patch added: Patch using dpkg-query --listfiles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/popularity-contest/+bug/742017/+attachment/2139509/+files/popularity-contest.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Shoot,
I just realized two shortcomings of my first patch (from comment #3)
- the --showformat command-line argument was missing the crucial extra
format-string (--showformat='\${status} \${package}
\${package}:\${architecture}\\n')
- there is a much cleaner way to access the required
Using dpkg-query is of course better in terms of compatibility and I
would, usually, prefer it, but this change makes popularity-contest ugly
slow. On my P4 3GHz box with about 2500 packages installed it takes
about 5 minutes to complette, while previous version with direct file
access complettes
Either that or nice-ing it -- as this is a background job it really doesn't
matter when the results are available.
As long as it completes before the next run is started, of course.
Do you happen to know which resource is most strained by this patched
installation?
If it is i/o we would need to
** Patch added: Fixed version of patch from comment #3 -- also search in
architecture-specific files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/popularity-contest/+bug/742017/+attachment/2139877/+files/popularity-contest.arch_files.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Branch linked: lp:~abone/ubuntu/natty/popularity-contest/fix-742017
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by multiarch
I've commited changes suggested by torgeh as a branch:
lp:~abone/ubuntu/natty/popularity-contest/fix-742017
By the way debian upstream also has a fix for the this in version 1.52,
but they don't try to access arch file, just report if pkg.list is not
accessible.
--
You received this bug
Hi,
had the same problem here, fixed it with the attached popularity-contest
that tries again with the architecture-specific filename.
HTH
Torge H
** Attachment added: Patched popularity-contest retries with arch-specific
filenames
Hi,
sorry for the unrelated changes in my last post.
Now a real patch against /usr/sbin/popularity-contest as of
popularity-contest 1.51ubuntu1 with minimal changes.
The bug encountered raises a question though: why wasn't a lint rule
along the lines of never use open without interpreting the
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by multiarch
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #555790
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555790
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Debian)
Importance: Undecided = Unknown
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Debian)
Status: New = Unknown
** Changed in: popularity-contest
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by
** Tags added: multiarch
** Tags removed: running-unity
** Also affects: popularity-contest (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742017
Title:
readline() on closed filehandle FILES warnings caused by multiarch
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
