[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: ubuntu-geonames Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750395 Title: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog --

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-07 Thread Karl Lattimer
attached branch fixes this issue ** Branch linked: lp:~mterry/ubuntu-geonames/search-alt ** Changed in: ubuntu-geonames Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-07 Thread Karl Lattimer
** Changed in: ubuntu-geonames Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750395 Title: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog --

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Lattimer
I'm wondering if this is also the case with ubiquity as both use geonames.org -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750395 Title: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog --

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-05 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report, the locations are coming from the ubuntu- geonames database though so it's likely missing there ** Also affects: ubuntu-geonames Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in:

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Lattimer
@Seb I was thinking that they've got a point about filtering the geographic features and sticking to towns, cities and at a broader stroke countries. Also the prioritising mentioned is equally valid two cities with the same name e.g. London there's Canada/London and Europe/London making sure the

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-05 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Right, that's the issue when bugs describe different issues, that one will be used to track the fact that lima, peru is not listed by the database, could you open a new one about the locations filtering issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-05 Thread Karl Lattimer
bug #751212 is a continuation of this bug concerning filtering and sorting of the results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750395 Title: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in

[Bug 750395] Re: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog

2011-04-04 Thread Steve Magoun
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750395 Title: Missing/poorly prioritized entries in Locations dialog -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com