[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 one thing about free software is that it is destined to the community so when feedback comes back from the community it is not only stupid to ignore it but it is against first principles as well. now steubens

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 and my trac tickets? i'd hope you'd address the problem, not just the words i chose -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 My mistake: second duplicate. It appears I had this ticket open in two tabs and counted it twice. I'm not going to engage you in a further debate. I don't think we are going to find agreement on this topic. I

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 my main issue was there was no public discussion; there was a trac post that seemed to invite public discussion, then a second post that confirmed the original post-hoc, there was no public discussion and it i

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 my trac posts are still in moderation, i haven't seen you really try to refute anything -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 more of the same, classy. this isn't the place for this btw. and it isn't the "third" duplicate i posted, i asked about the process for submitting it as a patch, i filed one duplicate before i even knew how

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 This appears to be a duplicate of #713604 and is the third duplicate you've filed for that ticket. I understand that you disagree with the upstream development team's opinion of proxy support; nevertheless, c

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713604 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713604 I'm marking this bug as a duplicate of bug #713604. The issue has been widely discussed in the upstream tracker and it is my belief that we, as a distribution, should not go against upstream wishes. ** This b

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

** Description changed: Binary package hint: transmission tried contacting upstream and I got the rudest most vile treatment for even broaching the subject and requesting information about public discussion (their trac tickets on the matter invite public response, but they don't allow

[Bug 765248] Re: patch to add proxy support from 2.12 to 2.13

** Patch added: "patch to restore proxy prefs and functionality" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765248/+attachment/2063701/+files/0117-restore_proxy_support.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch