[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/icedtea-web -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Title: Forcing installation of firefox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-06-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted icedtea-web into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags added: verification-needed

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/icedtea-web -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Title: Forcing installation of firefox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package icedtea-web - 1.1~20110530-1ubuntu1 --- icedtea-web (1.1~20110530-1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * Regenerate the control file. * Add other browsers as an alternative to firefox depends. LP: #766559. icedtea-web (1.1~20110530-1) unstable; urgency

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-30 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Title: Forcing installation of firefox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/m

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
please wait until later this week for the 1.1 release (see bug #767144) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Title: Forcing installation of firefox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Unsubscribing sponsors, as there currently is nothing more to upload. ** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Titl

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Julien's debdiff looks fine for a natty SRU, I added a natty task and uploaded to the natty queue. Note that as per the SRU rules this needs to be fixed in oneiric before it can get to natty-updates. Please report this bug to Debian and proposed dropping the Depends to a Suggests: ** Also affects

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-05-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Looking at this, I'm not even sure why we'd depend on a web browser at all. Shouldn't it be done in a similar way as for flashplugin-installer where the web browsers are suggests instead of recommends/depends? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-21 Thread Julien Lavergne
The virtual package sound like a good idea for oneiric. But for natty, we should add others browsers not to force people to have firefox to use Java. I updated the debdiff. ** Patch removed: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-21 Thread Felix Braun
Why has this been marked incomplete (meaning the *report* is incomplete)? Comment #4 suggests that the fix should be revisited for oneiric. But still the suggested fix should be pushed into natty! ** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this b

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-21 Thread Micah Gersten
Please don't add xulrunner-2.0 since there's only one browser left that uses it. Can't we solve this (for oneiric and on) by making the NPAPI capable browsers provide a virtual package that these plugins can depend on? ** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete --

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-20 Thread Julien Lavergne
Attached debdiff add chromium-browser as an alternative, or xulrunner to keep compatibility with previous behavior. As I'm not a xul/firefox expert, the last one is maybe not necessary. ** Patch added: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedte

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-20 Thread Julien Lavergne
Attached debdiff add chromium-browser as an alternative, or xulrunner to keep compatibility with previous behavior. As I'm not a xul/firefox expert, the last one is maybe not necessary. ** Patch added: "icedtea-web_1.1~20110406-0ubuntu3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedte

[Bug 766559] Re: Forcing installation of firefox

2011-04-19 Thread Wladimir Mutel
Agreed. Not everyone wants to have Firefox installed on their system just for the sake of using Java plugin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766559 Title: Forcing installation of firefo