Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 11:21, Launchpad Bug Tracker <770...@bugs.launchpad.net > wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug by Daniel Holbach (dholbach): > > Binary package hint: unity > > I'm playing Devil's Advocate here really but the "Ubuntu bra

Re: Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-07-26 Thread Marcus Haslam
I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 9 Jun 2011, at 12:19, Mark Shuttleworth <770...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Heh. Good catch, Daniel! I think we can approve the exception in > this case. > > status wontfix > > Mark > > > ** Changed in: ayatana-design >   Status: Confirmed => Wo

Re: [Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-06-09 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Heh. Good catch, Daniel! I think we can approve the exception in this case. status wontfix Mark ** Changed in: ayatana-design Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 770478] [NEW] bfb does not conform with Ubuntu Brand Guidelines

2011-04-25 Thread Greg Auger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity I'm playing Devil's Advocate here really but the "Ubuntu brandmark and circle of friends.pdf" file [1] that forms part of the Ubuntu Brand Guidelines [2] says clearly on page 7 that: "The Circle of Friends, when used on its own, [without the wo