** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Opinion
** No longer affects: unity
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772792
Title:
Is slow to work with Unity when it has too
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772792
Title:
Is slow to work with Unity when it has too many icons(bring back upper
accor
I think that now with the BFB in the launcher it's not good to hide it
in the concertina. If this behavior is implemented, only the icons below
it should collapse.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
'Now this is only when "users are divided", so if no one comes to defend
the current behavior with valid arguments, than there is no need for it
and can be dropped in favor of bringing the old one back!'
That's PRECISELY my point. I'm simply telling you to stop proposing
solutions that only apply
@conscioususer
yes, am pretty aware how development works.
>In everything you wrote, you didn't mention one single advantage of the
current behavior.
for me there is NONE really, am advocating the old one for default too
:)
But like i said before, if they don't "want" (who knows why) to
impleme
@manny,
In everything you wrote, you didn't mention one single advantage of the
current behavior.
Please re-read this report. This is what it has so far:
- one developer not rejecting the report and forwarding it to designers
- Mark not remembering of the current behavior being requested
- me me
@conscioususer
Yes, I certainly think the old behavior was tons Smarter/better, but
this is an interface in "constant evolution", so any one of the design
team developers may wake up one day with a "better idea for the default"
and get rid completely of the old behavior people like or are used to.
@manny, why an option?
So far, judging from the complete lack of arguments in favor of the
current implementation in this report, I'd say that the best course of
actions is bringing back the old behavior and that's it.
I honestly see no advantage in the current implementation, regardless if
the u
Should be an customizable option depending how the user uses its
computer and how many shortcut/apps they have on the launcher at the
time. Not every user is equal and the current behavior is not optimal
for many. Is good as default and for casual user with 2 or 3 shortcuts,
but power user needs mo
I remember asking Neil Patel about this on Twitter a long time ago, and
if I remember correctly he told me it was a deliberate design decision,
though he himself did not agree with it. It's too long ago for me to
find the tweets, though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Summary changed:
- Is slow to work with Unity when it has too many icons
+ Is slow to work with Unity when it has too many icons(bring back upper
accordion of launcher)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
11 matches
Mail list logo