Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server)
I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or
correct behavior.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1]
283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1]
78154
If you're not sure if this is an issue or not then you should have made
some research first or ask this on forums instead of reporting it as a
bug.
Here is what I just found:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/the-meaning-of-devmd0-no-md-super-block-found-517869/
--
mdadm r
18 matches
Mail list logo
