This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.124
---
ubuntu-dev-tools (0.124) unstable; urgency=low
[ Benjamin Drung ]
* Move add-patch, edit-patch, suspicious-source, what-patch, and wrap-and-sort
from ubuntu-dev-tools into devscripts (Closes: #568481).
[ Daniel
** Branch linked: lp:debian/ubuntu-dev-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051
Title:
mk-sbuild is untruthful
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051
Title:
mk-sbuild is untruthful
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
According to persia, this was once necessary. Fixing for now. mk-sbuild
will hopefully go away soon ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu-
dev-tools/+spec/other-o-udt-upstreaming )
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-dev-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051
Title:
mk-sbuild is untruthful
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Rather, it's just outdated. There's some other cruft in there (for
instance, the current created sbuild.conf entries will generate
deprecation warnings, and they should have been put in conf.d anyway to
avoid maintainer script merge issues). I don't know that it's worth
fixing it: mk-sbuild shoul
