For me having the l-m-c log available somewhere at the image should be
enough already to understand the cmd-line arguments that was used and
also the rootfs and hwpack files.
For a more consistent version ID we should have a file created by live-
helper when creating the rootfs, describing which
** Changed in: linaro-images
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: linaro-images
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789135
Title:
Add image/hwpack
root@linaro:/var/lib# cat ubuntu_dist_channel
# This is a distribution channel descriptor
# For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
canonical-oem-linaro-natty-alip-20110527-0
root@linaro:/var/lib# dpkg -l hwpack*|tee
ii hwpack-linaro-panda-x11-base
and we should drop 'canonical-oem' string.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789135
Title:
Add image/hwpack information into image
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:25:49 -, Marcin Juszkiewicz
789...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
root@linaro:/var/lib# cat ubuntu_dist_channel
# This is a distribution channel descriptor
# For more information see
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
I know it's probably a topic for other bug, but do we have the logs from
l-m-c somewhere available at the image? Checking the cmd line arguments
used with l-m-c can also be useful for debugging.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I'm pretty sure we don't have lmc logs anywhere in the image. I guess
the important thing would be the logs of the hwpack installation?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789135
Title:
