Accepted into edgy-updates.
** Changed in: gnome-hearts (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Great, thanks!
uploaded to edgy-updates:
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:41:18 +0200
Source: gnome-hearts
Binary: gnome-hearts
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.2-1ubuntu1.1
Distribution: edgy-updates
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stefan Potyra <[E
Well, that's easy. I have it installed on three Edgy systems for quite a
while now and haven't had any problems.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
Hi K. Deniz,
can you please try, if the version in edgy-proposed works for you? To do
this, you can either add edgy-proposed to your sources.list or you can
get the .deb directly from
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gnome-hearts/gnome-
hearts_0.1.2-1ubuntu1.1~proposed1_i386.deb (i
Hello K. Deniz Ogut,
You should read a bit more on how Synaptic works. Synaptic does not show
just all the packages in the Edgy repository but also all the packages
that you have installed manually -- no matter where they came from. So,
when you went to my website and downloaded & installed gnome-
Hello Dear Developers,
I'm an Edgy user. In my opinion, the problem still exists.
Today I searched for "hearts" in Synaptic and installed what proposed. (I
didn't give attention at that time but later I realized that it was version
0.1.2-1.) It simply didn't work and crashed at startup. After so
Works for me (bonded is not default now, however, enabling it cause no
problems).
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Tags added: verification-motu-needed
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Accepted into edgy-proposed. Please solicit testing.
** Changed in: gnome-hearts (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Committed
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:31:39 +0200
Source: gnome-hearts
Binary: gnome-hearts
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.2-1ubuntu1.1~proposed1
Distribution: edgy-proposed
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: vi
Ready for uploading to edgy-proposed
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I'd say, we all have now read the large diff several times, and we now
know what's going on there. Let's keep this current diff (and count my
funny 0.7 as +1.0) ;)
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Currently this SRU (removing patch file) has +3 (or 2.7) votes.
If somebody else thinks it is better to remove simple-patchsys.mk than
patch file please add your opinion to this report. If this new SRU
(simple-patchsys.mk) gets +3 votes (instread 2.7 ;-)) I'll create a new debdiff.
--
[SRU] gno
Just a thought: Wouldn't the debdiff be /much/ clearer if you just
removed "include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk" from
debian/rules? It's pretty obvious what the semantics of that change
would be, and its diffstat would be much more suitable.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup
Yes great. No duplicates (I just rechecked with the search on p.u.c).
+1 thus.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Here's debdiff between .debs sed (-e 's/^.*\.\///)
--- olddeb 2007-01-15 20:32:38.0 +0200
+++ newdeb 2007-01-15 20:32:20.0 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
usr/share/man/
usr/share/man/man6/
usr/share/man/man6/gnome-hearts.6.gz
+usr/share/pixmaps/
+usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-hear
Damn, I guess I shouldn't have started with +-0... now it's impossible
to get a +3, since we're only 4 members of motu-sru :/.
@ville: can you give a diff of the filelists (dpkg -c olddeb vs. dpkg -c
newdeb)? If we don't have file-conflicts between that and a cards-
package? Then I'll reconsider.
While I agree to sistpoty that the patch is really invasive, I'd rather
go with upstream in this case, and tend more to agree with crimsun.
+0.7 from me.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
hm... this patch is more invasive and changes the list of installed
files, which the first approach doesn't.
I prefer the less invasive one, but feel free to override me.
+/-0 from me thus.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Ok, this approach seems sane, too. +1
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I think upstream author is right, we should just drop that gnome cards patch. I
made a new debdiff ~proposed1
and tested it on edgy without segfaults.
This needs three new votes from MOTU SRU team.
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-hearts
Original bug: Bug #65274
Origin
I'm the upstream author who also wrote the 01_gnome_cards_data patch.
That patch was made because Debian split gnome-games-extra-data into
extra data and cards-data. Because Edgy doesn't have the gnome-cards-
data package, I propose you simply drop the patch alltogether. This is
what I did for my u
Looks sane, +1.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
+1
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Thanks, here's a fixed version.
** Attachment added: "gnome-hearts.debdiff"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5725114/gnome-hearts.debdiff
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
** Attachment added: "gnome-hearts.debdiff"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5725109/gnome-hearts.debdiff
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-
I guess you should also s/bonded.png/bonded.svg/ in
01_gnome_cards_data.patch. Also, you should start your patch name with a
number and not the string ubuntu, to make it clear in which order the
patches need to be applied.
Other than that, looks fine.
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (ed
** Attachment added: "gnome-hearts.debdiff"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5724186/gnome-hearts.debdiff
** Changed in: gnome-hearts (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ville palo
--
[SRU] gnome-hearts crashes on startup (edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79059
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
28 matches
Mail list logo
