Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
Ubuntu Application Package Architecture Problem
In systems prior to Natty [11.04], building packages for both simple
utility applications was quite easy. If the package architecture was set
to all, then the package would install on both i386 and amd64 systems.
With 11.04, the rules have changed apparently. The Ubuntu Software
Center now reports a bad package quality with lintian if an all
architecture package contains a program executable.
So, to avoid this error for a small utility programs one will need to
build two packages: one with i386 and one with amd64.
Do we really think that we need to burden the entire ubuntu application
eco-system with two packages for every minor utility?
At least, the system does not require /usr/bin and /usr/bin32, as
windows x64 has done with Program Files and Program Files(x86) which is
totally silly since the architectue knows when it runs the application
exe that it is an x64 image or an x86 image.
I have seen no documentation of the reason behind this choice, despite
many hours of searching for package policies and studying many documents
in both the Debian and Ubuntu documentation sites.
It seems that the policy needs either some work and changes or some
documentation.
I have found no documentation about how to build packages for Ubuntu
Software Center, which now employs lintian. ANd I have found no
documentation about the policies of lintian or where they have been
reviewed and decided. It seems they have not received wide review,
Based on this I am posting a bug against the Ubuntu Software Center for
the inability to build a package that will install a perfectly good
working i386 exe program on both an i386 and an amd64 system.
I am not posting this as a lack of documentation, since I think this is
a larger problem than a documentation note that says build two packages.
That is not a reasonable solution for the many utilities that many of
need to deploy in ubuntu systems. I'm quite sure there are many
packages, some for utilities, that will need to be different for both
i386 and amd64 systems. And I am also aware that all is not a good
choice since that would imply that the package should be valid for an
ARM or PPC based system. But along the way, we have failed to put in the
architecture case of allx86, which is the case that we really need.
Where is the policy, and how do we get it changed?
Thanks,
WindyWeather
** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792004
Title:
Architecture Policy inadaquate
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
