Re: [Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-02 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:37PM -, Benjamin Drung wrote: There still one test failing in my amd64 chroot: Running binaries-general 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: --- t/tests/binaries-general/tagsting...2011-06-27 17:20:44.0 + +++

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-02 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:30:37PM -, Benjamin Drung wrote: There still one test failing in my amd64 chroot: Running binaries-general 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: --- t/tests/binaries-general/tagsting...2011-06-27 17:20:44.0 + +++

Re: [Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-02 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
I just ran the experiment on a Debian unstable (i386 arch) chroot, and objdump --only-keep-debug did not cause the resulting binary to be statically linked. -- ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
Is this a bug in objdump or a misuse of lintian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798513 Title: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-02 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:16:24PM -, Benjamin Drung wrote: Is this a bug in objdump or a misuse of lintian? ---end quoted text--- Running objdump --only-keep-debug on a dynamically linked binary on Ubuntu i386 caused the resulting binary to become statically linked (uses shared libs).

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-01 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
That doesn't happen on i386 arch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798513 Title: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
... but on amd64! Let's wait for 2.5.2, which builds on amd64 and which can be synced if the last outstanding change (Debian bug #631872) is fixed too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-07-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lintian - 2.5.1ubuntu1 --- lintian (2.5.1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #798513). Remaining changes: - Don't warn about a symlinked changelog file in Ubuntu due to CDBS. - Add no-upstream-changelog tag to

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
Please use merge in the title or add the tag merge to the bug. Otherwise it won't be shown as merge in the sponsoring overview. ** Tags added: merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
There still one test failing in my amd64 chroot: Running binaries-general 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: --- t/tests/binaries-general/tagsting...2011-06-27 17:20:44.0 + +++ debian/tests/binaries-general/tags.binaries-general 2011-06-27

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-24 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Thanks Niels, that fixed it. ** Patch removed: Debdiff against Debian's lintian 2.5.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/798513/+attachment/2178101/+files/lintian_2.5.1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: Debdiff against Debian's lintian 2.5.1

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-23 Thread Niels Thykier
You might want to cherry-pick 5d5a40f[1]. ~Niels [1]http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=5d5a40fb5a5f7cbda8ec4b200decaba73d8c3580 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-22 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
** Patch removed: Debdiff against Debian's lintian 2.5.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/798513/+attachment/2172437/+files/lintian_2.5.1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: Debdiff against Debian's lintian 2.5.1

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-22 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Note, this package FTBFS on Ubuntu at Raw Debian source package tests: Running magic-architecture-srcpkg-ok... building... testing... FAILED: --- t/source/magic-architecture-srcpkg-ok/tags 2011-01-27 13:31:42.0 + +++ debian/tests/tags.magic-architecture-srcpkg-ok

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-21 Thread Philipp Kaluza
Recommending as a useful tool for the pycentral - dh_python2 transition. ** Tags added: pycentral-deprecation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798513 Title: Candidate revision lintian

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-17 Thread Dave Walker
** Description changed: Binary package hint: lintian lintian (2.5.1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low - * Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #nn). Remaining changes: - - Don't warn about a symlinked changelog file in Ubuntu due to CDBS. - - Add no-upstream-changelog tag to

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-16 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
** Patch added: Debdiff against Debian's lintian 2.5.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/798513/+attachment/2172437/+files/lintian_2.5.1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1

2011-06-16 Thread Micah Gersten
Do we really need this change anymore since we have perl 5.12 now? - Prefer libtest-simple-perl (= 0.93) to perl (= 5.12). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798513 Title: Candidate