[Bug 799225] Re: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-19 Thread Andreas Moog
** Changed in: libaqbanking (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799225 Title: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable

[Bug 799225] Re: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-19 Thread Charlie Kravetz
** Changed in: libaqbanking (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799225 Title: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable

[Bug 799225] Re: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-19 Thread Andreas Moog
sync request ACKed... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799225 Title: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 799225] Re: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-19 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Micha: On Ubuntu it only failed on i386, but can't find build logs for that in Debian. And a small remark: The version error it gives is 'WARNING:', but it makes build fail (as it has an exit 1). Shouldn't this be replaced by ERROR? Cause a Warning shouldn't be a build stopper imo. -- You

[Bug 799225] Re: Sync libaqbanking 5.0.10-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-19 Thread Micha Lenk
Jean-Louis: regarding WARNING vs. ERROR you're partly right. In case the build stops this seems to be rather an error than a warning. However, the check is some guesswork which is intended to *warn* me in cases where the check fails on first build. In this particular case the check didn't fire for