edubuntu-meta (1.35) gutsy; urgency=low
* Include a copy of GPLv2 (LP: #80513).
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:11:34 +0100
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are
kubuntu-meta (1.44) gutsy; urgency=low
* Include a copy of GPLv2 (LP: #80513).
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:09:50 +0100
** Changed in: edubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.la
ubuntu-meta (1.54) gutsy; urgency=low
* Include a copy of GPLv2 (LP: #80513).
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:08:15 +0100
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fi
xubuntu-meta has already been fixed. I've opened bugs for the other
*-meta source packages in main.
** Also affects: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: edubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ubuntu-meta does not incl
I'll take this.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Assignee: Martin Pitt => Colin Watson
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact fo
Martin: do you think this is necessary?
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Assignee: Jordan Kanter => Martin Pitt
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Your debdiff is empty. Moreover, I'm unsubscribing Ubuntu Universe
Sponsor as ubunt-meta is not in Universe.
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug con
attached the debdiff here
** Attachment added: "short debdiff that contains the gpl2. Not sure if this is
the right license, but it's worth a shot"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8336049/meta.debdiff
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
Y
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jordan Kanter
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in source tarball
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The full text of the GPL does need to be in the source package, even
though it's OK for the binary package to contain a reference in this
case.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Brian => (unassigned)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
ubuntu-meta does not include GPL in s
In the debian directory there is a file called copyright which refers
people to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL . Do you believe that is
sufficient?
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
ubuntu-meta does not include G
12 matches
Mail list logo
