This bug was fixed in the package cups-pdf - 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1
---
cups-pdf (2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low
* Maintenance release to the 2.5.0 branch for Ubuntu Lucid and Maverick.
Backports many maintainer script features to foolproof the installation
This bug was fixed in the package cups-pdf - 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~maverick1
---
cups-pdf (2.5.0-17ubuntu1~maverick1) maverick-proposed; urgency=low
* Maintenance release to the 2.5.0 branch for Ubuntu Lucid and Maverick.
Backports many maintainer script features to foolproof the
According to bug #573667 verification is done on Lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage
Hello Martin-Éric, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cups-pdf into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
This bug was fixed in the package cups-pdf - 2.5.1-3~natty2
---
cups-pdf (2.5.1-3~natty2) natty-proposed; urgency=medium
* Added a step in [postinst] to ensure that CUPS has successfully reloaded.
* Added 'cupsenable' and 'cupsaccept' steps in [postinst] to ensure that
the
SRU team:
We still need 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1 and 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~maverick1 to be
build for lucid-proposed and maverick-proposed, respectively, so that
they can be tested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
As confirmed in bug #836278, natty-proposed is verified.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage
The Natty package seems to perform as expected on my Ubuntu/stable host.
Awaiting the -proposed approval to test the Lucid package. Since the
-proposed package for Maverick is exactly the same, one can assume that
whoever tests either one would get equivalent results, so if my tests on
Lucid are
Uploaded as 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1 and 2.5.0-17ubuntu1~maverick1
respectively.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and
Here's a debdiff against what's in Lucid-proposed and Maverick-proposed
of what I would propose for Lucid and Maverick, based on the feedback
that produced the consolidated diff for Natty.
I'd obviously append a changelog entries called 2.5.0-17squeeze2~lucid1
and 2.5.0-17squeeze2~maverick1 for
For me the PDF printer of cups-pdf works in Natty. It gets correctly set
up with A4 as default when installing and correctly removed when
uninstalling the package, the PPD is also correct (so it updated when I
got the package with my updates). Everything perfect.
** Tags removed:
The queue creation and removal in your debdiff for Lucid and Maverick is
OK. No I do not remember when exactly I introduced the automatic PPD
updating (look into the debian/changelog of packages like hplip or
foomatic-db). In distributions which have this functionality, cups-pdf
should offer it,
PPD updating was introduced in CUPS 1.5.0-3 as a standard feature.
I've added the manual code to Natty to cover for updates from previous
releases, which had a different PPD.
Releases older than that don't need any PPD updating since the've had
the same one forever.
--
You received this bug
Then it is OK, upload it this way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage notifications about this
There are now two cups-pdf uploads in the Natty unapproved queue;
~natty2 and ~natty3.
~natty3 appears to contain the changes from ~natty2, but the changes
file doesn't contain both revisions.
I've rejected both from the unapproved queue. Could you please upload a
package versioned ~natty2 with
Hello Martin-Éric, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cups-pdf into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
** Branch linked: lp:debian/cups-pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage notifications about this
I have reviewed the debdiff for the version uploaded to natty-proposed
and all seems to be correct there. Please approve this package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
** Summary changed:
- SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid and Maverick
+ SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
First, probably the -E in the lpadmin command line was misplaced. It
seems that when it is used before -p printer that it forces
encryption, which makes lpadmin fail on some configurations. Used after
-p printer, it enables the queue and makes it accepting jobs (see also
the man page of lpadmin).
Thanks for the advice on where to insert cupsenable and cupsaccept
steps.
As for encryption, I still don't see why we need to force its usage,
especially given how we'll be manipulating localhost at all steps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Encryption is not needed at all, so do not use -E at any place and use
cupsenable and cupsaccept. This assures best compatibility with all
possible CUPS configurations.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Here's the debdiff for Natty.
** Patch added: CUPS-PDF debdiff for Natty (2.5.1-3 to 2.5.1-3~natty3)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-pdf/+bug/805947/+attachment/2396818/+files/cups-pdf_2.5.1-3_to_2.5.1-3%7Enatty3.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Looks OK for me.
Disabling and rejecting the queue before removing it is not actually
needed but it also does not break anything.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU:
Uploaded and waiting for approval.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage notifications about this
This bug was fixed in the package cups-pdf - 2.5.1-5
---
cups-pdf (2.5.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Modified the force-reload loop in [postinst|prerm|postrm] to end with ||:
rather than with ||true for consistency with other maintainer commands.
* Added a wait loop in
Still waiting on the approval of 2.5.1-3~natty3 for natty-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/cups-pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805947
Title:
SRU: hand-picked packaging fixes for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
To manage notifications about this
28 matches
Mail list logo
