That wouldn't include a black/whitelist, of course; I don't believe that
this is going to work anyway. OEM installs can modify the .pkla to turn
it back on if desired.
** Summary changed:
- Disable hibernate option when it is not supported
+ Disable hibernate option by default
** Also affects: p
/var/lib/polkit-1/localauthority/10-vendor.d/com.ubuntu.desktop.pkla
already has a commented out stanza how to disable this. Easiest to
disable it there.
** Package changed: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) => policykit-desktop-
privileges (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: policykit-desktop-privileges (Ubuntu
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812394
Title:
Disable hibernate option when it is not supported
To manage no
Ted Gould [2011-08-25 15:41 -]:
> The question becomes: how do HW vendors that *do* care about Ubuntu
> enough to ensure that hibernation works on their system express that so
> that we know we're on one of those systems?
Again, hibernation often doesn't fail because of a particular system,
bu
When OEM role a custom Ubuntu release for new hardware they will be able
to include the new hardware on the white list. And all 'Ubuntu
Certified' hardware (where it is testing and know to work) will also be
included, so I think we are good here for now. It would also be great
to have a community
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
> My gut feeling is that we should just disable hibernation by default,
> period (and perhaps provide an Ui configuration bit to enable it).
> Maintaining and checking a whitelist will just cause a lot of
> unnecessary effort which won't actuall
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Assignee: (unassigned) => John Lea (johnlea)
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags removed: needs-design
** Tags added: udo
--
You received this bug notificatio
Retitling and reopening as per previous comment.
However, I still don't understand the rationale for having a machine
type whitelist.; see (2) in comment 5. Do we have hard data that
hibernation is consistently broken on some particular hardware, and the
reason isn't just partitioning?
My gut fee
