[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2015-07-05 Thread rjasmin
IS MPL2 GPL compatible then? Theres no harm in adding in more Debain packages.UBUNTU clearly abuses that privilege enough already. Why tread on user freedoms and claim yourself free when you arent? Do like Debian does and disable non-free until the user makes the choice to use it. Inform the use

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-02 Thread Sam Morris
The logo is now licensed under MPL 2, according to . The upstream bug was . ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #541761 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.c

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-01 Thread Thomas Hotz
Is this still present because I use Chromium? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 Title: Some Firefox components are non-free To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://b

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2012-10-01 Thread Thomas Hotz
Can you please retest with a supported Firefox version? Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 Title: Some Firefox components are non-free To manage notifications about this

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2011-02-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 Title: Some Firefox components are non-free --

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2011-01-06 Thread Alexander Sack
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) => Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 Title: Some Firefox components are non-f

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2010-01-14 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
The "about:license" page doesn't include this section anymore; "Image files containing the trademarks and logos of the Mozilla Foundation, which may not be reproduced without permission. (Copyright ©2004-2006 The Mozilla Foundation. All Rights Reserved.)" Checked on Firefox 3.5, Ubuntu 9.10 (Kar

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2009-05-26 Thread Sam Morris
No it wasn't. The 'firefox' package which contains non-free content still exists in main. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2009-05-26 Thread John Vivirito
This was fixed with the package "abrowser" this is a unbranded version of firefox built using same source just name and frieds were changed. ** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) => firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Some Firefox

Re: [Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-13 Thread Lenny Domnitser
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone willing to put work into providing a real free firefox and > forking out artwork branding to a separate package is invited to jump > in #ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net and help to get this sorted. As I

Re: [Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-13 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:15:07PM -, Nick Bauermeister wrote: > As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to > the "restricted" component wouldn't be a good solution. > > Ubuntu already installs packages from "restricted" by default, so where would > be the harm i

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-05-04 Thread Nick Bauermeister
As I see it, there still has been no reason given, why moving Firefox to the "restricted" component wouldn't be a good solution. Ubuntu already installs packages from "restricted" by default, so where would be the harm if Firefox was one of them? The regular user wouldn't even know about it and d

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2008-03-04 Thread Sam Morris
I guess there has still been no progress on this issue. What a disappointment. -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free

2007-10-24 Thread StefanPotyra
setting to confirmed as I can easily confirm the copyright statement. If that's inadequate for the recent changes to the license applying for main (http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components) please mark this bug as invalid for ubuntu and open a task for gobunto. Otherwise, if the licen