[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-10-05 Thread Stefano Rivera
Looks like this is a bug in /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindQt4.cmake. It expects all Qt4 modules to be in a subdirectory of QT_LIBRARY_DIR, but phonon hasn't been multi-arched yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 05, 2011, at 09:14 PM, Didier Raboud wrote: From the upstream IRC chan, today: renato OdyX`, I have confirmed the problem is related with cmake + phonon dev package renato I suggest to you create a patch that always add the phonon dir on CMakeList file renato until we get this problem

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
I spoke with one of the phonon developers (who's also a Kubuntu dev) and he felt the problem was that the phonon detection in pyside was wrong. Unless Odyx says otherwise, we want the latest pyside stack (FFe approved). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/pyside -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package pyside - 1.0.6.1-2ubuntu1 --- pyside (1.0.6.1-2ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * debian/patches/force-phonon.patch: Force the addition of the phonon directory to the CMake files. (LP: #832864) * debian/control: Ubuntu 11.10 only has

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-05 Thread Didier Raboud
From the upstream IRC chan, today: renato OdyX`, I have confirmed the problem is related with cmake + phonon dev package renato I suggest to you create a patch that always add the phonon dir on CMakeList file renato until we get this problem fixed on phonon-dev package I will prepare such a

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Didier Raboud
FYI, I have just uploaded backported packages targetted at oneiric to the official PySide PPA: https://launchpad.net/~pyside/+archive/ppa/+packages We'll see what gets out of that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
** Attachment added: pyside_1.0.6.1-2~test0_amd64.build https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyside/+bug/832864/+attachment/2344032/+files/pyside_1.0.6.1-2%7Etest0_amd64.build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 02, 2011, at 09:32 AM, Didier Raboud wrote: FYI, I have just uploaded backported packages targetted at oneiric to the official PySide PPA: https://launchpad.net/~pyside/+archive/ppa/+packages We'll see what gets out of that. Great, thanks Didier. I uploaded my own local build log so we

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Looking at the Debian build log I see it says: -- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found during configure and yours doesn't. I checked and libphonon-dev has the same VideoCaptureDevice headers in both distros, so no idea what's up there. -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 02, 2011, at 02:21 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Looking at the Debian build log I see it says: -- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found during configure and yours doesn't. I checked and libphonon-dev has the same VideoCaptureDevice headers in both distros, so no idea what's

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
Didier, could you take a look at PySide/phonon/CMakeLists.txt and tell me what the top of the file says. Here's what I've got: project(phonon) # workaround for a cmake bug under MacOSX, it finds phonon but not the include path if (NOT QT_PHONON_INCLUDE_DIR AND CMAKE_HOST_APPLE)

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Kate Stewart
** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric) Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-1 = ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
A bit more information: In PySide/CMakeLists.txt, if you replace the line that says HAS_QT_MODULE(QT_PHONON_FOUND phonon) with add_subdirectory(phonon) then you get the -- Checking for VideoCaptureDevice in phonon -- found line, and it appears to build phonon (I haven't tested it all the

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
One more thing: if this does manage to hack around the problem, then we still have the decision of whether to upgrade to a newer PySide and dependencies. My suspicion is that the same hack will get PySide 1.0.4 building too so an upgrade would not strictly be necessary. Scott, do you have an

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
If pyside still doesn't have any rdepends, I think we're should just go with the latest. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 02, 2011, at 06:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: If pyside still doesn't have any rdepends, I think we're should just go with the latest. There are rdeps in the stack: Package: python-pyside.qtcore Reverse Depends: python-pyside.qtcore:i386,python-pyside.qtcore

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) = Barry Warsaw (barry) ** Changed in: pyside (Ubuntu Oneiric) Milestone: None = ubuntu-11.10-beta-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
I've built the Debian sid stack of packages, and PySide still doesn't build phonon.so, so something else must clearly be going on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Build log? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-31 Thread Didier Raboud
hat type=Debian-maintainer-of-pyside on=head / Some data points: a) if you want to sync from Debian, you need apiextractor, generatorrunner and shiboken b) you don't need to run the full build to see if it will succeed, running one (of the 4) configure is enough. c) I'm maintaining the same

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-31 Thread Barry Warsaw
@ScottK: given where we are in the release cycle, doesn't it make more sense to try to fix the immediate problem rather than sync a bunch of new packages? debhelper is the most worrying one. The problem appears to be that phonon.so doesn't get built so there's nothing to install, and the

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-31 Thread Didier Raboud
@barry: debhelper is needed because of multiarch, that can easily be backported. In fact the PPA reverts everything multiarch-related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title:

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-31 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 31, 2011, at 03:19 PM, Didier Raboud wrote: @barry: debhelper is needed because of multiarch, that can easily be backported. In fact the PPA reverts everything multiarch-related. Thanks for the help Didier. I think it's worth at least giving the sync a try. I'll work on that and see how

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
Building this has been a challenge. Both pbuilder and sbuild fail on the libphonon-dev build-dep, e.g.: │ Install pyside build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hrm, I generally find sbuild's internal resolver to be the closest to Launchpad buildds. In this case, the internal resolver works fine (sbuild 0.62.5-1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 30, 2011, at 08:57 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hrm, I generally find sbuild's internal resolver to be the closest to Launchpad buildds. In this case, the internal resolver works fine (sbuild 0.62.5-1) Here's what the sbuild(1) manpage says about the internal resolver:

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
(this is way off topic for the bug, but wth). Launchpad uses an internal fork of sbuild from ages ago (before the apt/aptitude resolvers) which is why the internal resolver is closer to launchpad. Debian uses the aptitude resolver on most buildds, and apt on some. Yeah, I'm still building it

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
If this can be solved with a sync, I'd do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Stefano Rivera
Not syncable (pyside is a twisted heap of dependencies :) ): After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: debhelper(inst 8.9.0ubuntu1 ! = wanted 8.9.3~) shiboken(inst 1.0.4-2 ! = wanted 1.0.6) libshiboken-dev(inst 1.0.4-2 ! = wanted 1.0.6) shiboken-dbg(inst 1.0.4-2

Re: [Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
Yes. One has to do the set. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832864 Title: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 832864] Re: pyside version 1.0.4-1 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
My local build finally ended, confirming the failure in the original posting. Unfortunately, Chromium decided just then was a good time to lock the machine, so I lost my session. I'll start another build now so I can take a closer look at the problem in the morning. I guess I'll take this