Feisty is released so it is what it is. There's already a feisty-
backports request open on this.
** Changed in: anjuta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Wrong version of anjuta in feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83526
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Changed in: anjuta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Wrong version of anjuta in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/83526
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Anjuta 2.0.2 was an alpha release and was a disaster. So many people had
problems. 2.1.0 is a beta version. I don't have high hopes and say we
just stick to the stable version.
--
Wrong version of anjuta in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/83526
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
1. I am not sure what the package maintainer meant by stabilzing, because I
have been using anjuta in edgy for few months and considering that it is alpha
release it is pretty stable.
2. There are few packages in ubuntu which have versions higher than in debian
unstable ex. gtkpod. Could anjuta
anjuta (1:1.2.4a-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Reverting back to 1.2.4a since the 2.0.x series has not stabilised as
quickly as I would have liked. (closes: #367950)
-- Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:46:34 +
Might be worth filing a bug on the debian BTS that 2.1.
