[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2009-10-08 Thread RK
Isn't the core issue here that Ubuntu doesn't have any infrastructure to provide delta packages like e.g. OpenSuSE does? Because you can start splitting packages all you want, if an update to a 10MB documentation package that changes just one file of it requires a 10MB download without delta packag

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-09-11 Thread Harald Sitter
Unassign Kubuntu Team. Moving to dpkg. If dpkg would be any more reasonable in versioning packages (e.g. only bump version if binary content actually changed, or use per-file- versions like conary) redundant updating wouldn't happen. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: kdebase => dpkg

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-05-16 Thread Yuriy Kozlov
** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: meta-kde => kdebase -- redundant updating of packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-04-04 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Yes, of course, it's not a single package for all of KDE. But some of those are still pretty big. For example, kdebase is 30MB of sources, and it generates a whole lot of binary packages: kdebase, kappfinder, kate, kcontrol, kdebase-bin, kdebase-bin-kde3, kdebase-data, kdebase-dev, kdebase-doc, kde

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-04-04 Thread Terence Simpson
KDE is split in to several packages already, kdelibs, kdebase, kdeadmin, kdeedu, etc. So a change in one doesn't necessarily mean you have to rebuild the whole of KDE. -- redundant updating of packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83553 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-04-04 Thread Jonathan Jesse
Assigning this to the Kubuntu team... I think this hsould be a wishlist item ** Changed in: meta-kde (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Assignee: Jonathan Jesse (jjesse) => Kubuntu Team (kubuntu-team) Status: New => Triaged -- redundant updating of packages https://bugs.la

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-04-04 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Yes, of a sort. I still get lots of KDE packages updated only because of small changes in one component, although this is mitigated somewhat by my removing most of KDE by hand. If I understand the updating process correctly, this is caused by the fact that KDE comes in a big fat source package, an

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2008-04-03 Thread Jonathan Jesse
Are you still having problesm with redunant updating of packages? If so could please update this bug? Thanks, Jonathan ** Changed in: meta-kde (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jonathan Jesse (jjesse) Status: New => Incomplete -- redundant updating of packages https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2007-08-08 Thread Colin Watson
Nothing to do with ubuntu-meta - not really anything specifically to do with meta-kde either except that the KDE packages are pretty big and monolithic and so run into this aspect of the structure of the packaging system a lot. It definitely wouldn't have upgraded all of KDE, just all the binaries

[Bug 83553] Re: redundant updating of packages

2007-02-06 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Oh, this is about KDE only because that's the package I noticed today. I've seen this happen with many other sets of related packages. -- redundant updating of packages https://launchpad.net/bugs/83553 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis