This bug was fixed in the package ekiga - 3.3.2-0ubuntu1
---
ekiga (3.3.2-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/watch: Look for bz2 tarballs, and unstable versions.
* New upstream release. (LP: #836915)
* Drop libnotify0.7.patch, included upstream.
* Disable ubuntu_lpi.patch
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/opal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836915
Title:
opal is missing a b-d on ptlib, which is not in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
This bug was fixed in the package opal - 3.10.2~dfsg-0ubuntu1
---
opal (3.10.2~dfsg-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
[ Colin Watson ]
* Update to 3.10 version to fix FTBFS/NBS. (LP: #836915)
* Port to libav 0.7 API.
[ Martin Pitt ]
* New upstream bug fix release, required by
** Changed in: ekiga (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: opal (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ekiga
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ptlib
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836915
Title:
opal is missing a b-d on ptlib, which is not in oneiric
To manage no
** Also affects: ekiga (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: opal (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: Sebastien Bacher (seb128) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
** Changed in: ekiga (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
** Changed in: ekiga (Ubuntu O
This bug was fixed in the package ptlib - 2.10.2~dfsg-0ubuntu1
---
ptlib (2.10.2~dfsg-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
* Merge with Debian experimental. (LP: #836915) Remaining Ubuntu changes:
- debian/rules: Configure with --enable-exceptions, to avoid
-fno-exceptions leaki
I synced spandsp, as it is a prerequisite for the other packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836915
Title:
opal is missing a b-d on ptlib, which is not in oneiric
To manage notif
We all seem to be in agreement that we should go ahead (but find out
from an Asterisk user if it breaks asterisk). I think the alternatives
are much worse.
FFe granted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
I'm inclined to say go ahead with this at this point. Despite the
problems, it seems a lot more likely to work well than trying to bodge
together something that works out of the existing versions in the
archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I finally have working packages now:
* spandsp built unmodified from Debian sid
* ptlib from experimental, updated to 2.10.2
* opal from experimental, updated to 3.10.2, with Colin's patch added and
ported to 3.10.2
* ekiga 3.3.2
This brings up the main window, still remembers all my previo
Oh, forgot: spandsp has two rdepends in universe: asterisk and yate. The
new version doesn't break API/ABI, but still these two ought to be
tested with the new spandsp version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
FWIW, this is a can of worms:
* Current ekiga package in oneiric just shows me the network warning
dialog, and then hangs without showing anything, so it's unusable right
now.
* Current oneiric ekiga does not build against the 2.10.1/3.10.1
ptlib/opal stack from experimental
* Current upstrea
** Also affects: ptlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836915
Title:
opal is missing a b-d on ptlib, which is not in oneiric
To ma
it's not easy to summarize the changes, the opal tarballs have no
changelog or NEWS file and the diff between those versions is not really
trivial.
Updating the ekiga stack will only impact on ekiga mainly which is not
really actively maintained in Ubuntu nor bug free in its current version
it doe
Which implies that opal needs to go from 3.8.4 to 3.10.1 as well, unless
somebody can figure out how to get ptlib 3.8.4 to build and thinks it's
worth keeping the stack at 3.8. It looks as though ptlib and opal need
to broadly match.
Can we have a summary of the upstream feature changes in 3.8+3.
The attached patch fixes up opal 3.10.1~dfsg-1 to build against current
libav.
** Patch added: "opal_3.10.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opal/+bug/836915/+attachment/2362684/+files/opal_3.10.1%7Edfsg-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification b
subscribing the release team to get a ffe approval to update ptlib and
ekiga, ptlib has opal, ekiga and t38modem in its rdepends, t38modem has
been dropped from debian testing for a while and seems unmaintained so
it basically just impacts on ekiga, the experimental version seem to be
what other di
not sure now why opal got sycned, it was a while back during the start
of the cycle merges, we probably just followed GNOME there, seems the
easiest would be to update the experimental versions of ptlib and ekiga
as well, that stack have limited rdepends and updating them should not
be ok
--
You
On second thoughts, ptlib 2.10.1~dfsg-1 appears to be incompatible with
the version of opal in Oneiric (missing GetSessionVars somewhere or
other), and ptlib 2.8.4-1ubuntu1 fails to build with a hideous C++
backtrace, which appears to correspond with some kind of corrupted
allocation arena but valg
Some discussion on #ubuntu-release from a while back:
tumbleweed: hm, you're the last uploader of ptlib; AFAICS in order
to get opal building, we need to bump ptlib to a new upstream version (e.g.
merge from Debian experimental)
cjwatson: sure I can do that
cjwatson: the merge is trivial (con
The sync happened long before feature freeze (2011-05-02).
Are we sure that it's better to go back rather than forward here? I'm
unsure as to how much else may want the new opal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
Was there an FFe for this sync?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836915
Title:
opal is missing a b-d on ptlib, which is not in oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
23 matches
Mail list logo
