This bug was fixed in the package php-compat - 1.6.0a3-2
---
php-compat (1.6.0a3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Now using DEP5 for the debian/copyright.
* Now using pkg-php-tools and dh 8 short style (so depends on dh 8).
This also sloves an issue when rebuilding the package witho
Hi,
First of all, the package is team maintained. So it isn't only me here.
If you want, feel free to join the Debian PHP PEAR Maintainers , we'd be very (extremely, delighted...)
happy to have some more hands, because there's lots of packages to
maintain.
Second, I just had a longer look at the
Thomas, I think this is worth fixing in Debian too, because otherwise
any attempt by anyone other than you to upload the package will fail;
this should be counted as an RC bug (consider security support). You
don't need a new upstream tarball, though, as you could just add this
after dh_installdoc
On 08/31/2011 06:29 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of that package in Debian. Would it help you guys if
> I made another upload, fixing upstream tarball? Or is it fine as-is, and
> you can still accept it for the latest Ubuntu?
>
> There's no new upstream version, no bugs on
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of that package in Debian. Would it help you guys if
I made another upload, fixing upstream tarball? Or is it fine as-is, and
you can still accept it for the latest Ubuntu?
There's no new upstream version, no bugs on the package, so no real
reason for me to re-upload appart
I'm closing the Launchpad task based on Colin's explanation here.
Thanks, Colin!
** Changed in: launchpad
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836935
Title:
u
cjwatson@ries:~/ftp/pool/main/p/php-compat$ dpkg -c
php-compat_1.6.0a3-1_all.deb | grep
usr/share/doc/php-compat/tests/function/acosh.phpt
-rw-r--r-- root/root 263 2011-06-30 23:16
./usr/share/doc/php-compat/tests/function/acosh.phpt
I think what happened is as follows:
1) The Debian m
FWIW, on the Launchpad side, we do indeed do the rejection on our side,
but we'll accept packages dated as far back as 1984. This seems like
we're trying to match Debian since Colin notes the same check.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Matthias, are you sure? I see a virtually identical check in dak.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836935
Title:
upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past
To man
