[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2012-02-01 Thread Flames_in_Paradise
pls see also comment #3 in duplicate bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/875237/comments/3 /etc/fstab has to be set up correctly too, if you prefer automounting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2012-02-01 Thread Flames_in_Paradise
And some more with regards to ntfsfix: * ntfsfix: fixed volume dirty flag test * ntfsfix: new option to clear the list of bad sectors * ntfsfix: fixed compilation on Sparc * ntfsfix: fixed a bug causing a segmentation violation * ntfsfix: repair self-located MFT data bug -- Y

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2012-02-01 Thread Flames_in_Paradise
You may like to support bug 920545 "Upgrade NTFS-3G to new version [precise] One of a few interesting bugfixes is: * ntfsfix: new option -d to clear the dirty flag if fix is successful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-11-11 Thread Stuart Bishop
** Tags added: dist-upgrade natty2oneiric regression-release ** Description changed: + == Regression details == + Discovered in version: 11.10 + Last known good version: 11.04 + I've got a dualboot laptop, and the installer has created fstab entries for the NTFS partitions. But now oneiric i

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-11-03 Thread fenixk19
This bug is serious. Why does nothing happens to fix it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091 Title: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck To manage notifications about this bug g

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-19 Thread Thomas Goossens
I agree that this is a serious problem that might affect a lot of users. And needs to be fixed soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091 Title: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntf

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-17 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Also affects: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu Precise) Milestone: ubuntu-11.10 => None ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu Oneiric)

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-16 Thread Jedna Dvatři
Users should not have to intervene on every boot. Please, at least fix that much. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091 Title: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck To manage notif

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-15 Thread Rüdiger Kupper
1) This problem will affect all users that have ntfs checks requested in their fstab after upgrading to oneiric. These are supposedly *very many*. 2) The real problem is not that the check fails, but that oneiric's startup screen FALSELY reports that there were "serious problems" mounting the driv

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-15 Thread Jean-Pierre
> But what should I do when I start my Oneiric and it bothers me with > fsck.ntfs for my two windows partitions? As there is no possible check, you should not request a check. Checks at boot time are determined by the last field in /etc/fstab. : If the sixth field is not present or zero, a value

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-14 Thread dm
Yes, that's fine. But what should I do when I start my Oneiric and it bothers me with fsck.ntfs for my two windows partitions? It's not a solution to say 'If you want to call fsck.ntfs, do so with an option avoiding the checks, until some kind soul strives to develop them.' Haha. With Natty I n

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-06 Thread Jean-Pierre
> So, ntfs-3g should symlink fsck.ntfs to ntfsfix or ntfsck, > though the latter fails to check my partitions, It fails because the development of ntfsck has been interrupted years ago before anything useful was developed. > so maybe ntfsfix would be better. ntfsfix does not check the volume, it

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-05 Thread Denis Yurashkou
Anything is happening with this bug or not? Error is still there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091 Title: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck To manage notifications about t

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-01 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Is this doable for oneiric? ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 847465 ntfs partition is not mounted at boot time due to a supposedly "grave error" ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-11.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-10-01 Thread Ernst Sjöstrand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 847465 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/847465 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 847465 ntfs partition is not mounted at boot time due to a supposedly "grave error" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 838091] Re: should link fsck.ntfs -> ntfsfix/ntfsck

2011-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838091 Title: sho