On 04/10/2011 16:17, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Also, I don't think it's that much easier to spawn a separate python
> process just for doing a d-bus call. That can be done using gdbus
> without a lot of extra effort. (in case Chow wants to bring this into
> Debian).
>
Thanks, I'll look into this after
The session D-Bus interface of PackageKit is provided by gnome-
packagekit and not packagekit - alternatively session-installer can be
used.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840292
Title:
As for http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cosmos-door/ubuntu/oneiric/nautilus-
share/fix-840292-packagekit/revision/13: Adding the python dependency is
correct, but please drop ${python:Depends} and --with python2 again, as
this package doesn't ship Python modules.
** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu)
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus-share - 0.7.3-1ubuntu1
---
nautilus-share (0.7.3-1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low
* Add debian/patches/03_use_apturl.patch
+ Transition synaptic to apturl (LP: #840292)
-- Mitsuya ShibataTue, 04 Oct 2011 10:34:37 +0200
** Branch lin
So I'll sponsor the apturl one for now, as this is more appropriate for
this time in the release process. But it's more like a workaround, so
the real fix should indeed use the PK D-BUS API.
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Also, I don't think it's that much easier to spawn a separate python
process just for doing a d-bus call. That can be done using gdbus
without a lot of extra effort. (in case Chow wants to bring this into
Debian).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
As I discussed with seb128 on IRC earlier, the apturl diff looks more
promising than the packagekit one given the current, frozen state of the
archive, so sponsors, please take that one into oneiric for the time
being. I'll look into getting the PackageKit one into Debian or even
upstream later on.
Chow Loong Jin [2011-09-23 17:59 -]:
> Hmm, packagekit sounds like a good long term plan. Does it have a proper UI of
> its own
Yes, on the session bus both PackageKit itself and sessioninstaller
provide all necessary UI, it's rather easy to use.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
@hyperair, @pitti
Thank you for advices!
I create another branch to use session installer. Could you review it?
https://code.launchpad.net/~cosmos-door/ubuntu/oneiric/nautilus-share/fix-840292-packagekit
* Modified 02_install_missing_samba.patch, not new patch.
* Add dependency for "sessioninsta
** Branch linked: lp:~cosmos-door/ubuntu/oneiric/nautilus-
share/fix-840292-packagekit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840292
Title:
uses synaptic to install samba which is not on the
On 23/09/2011 14:32, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Chow Loong Jin [2011-09-23 3:53 -]:
>> Ooh, it does? Maybe we could add a Python wrapper script thing that uses
>> python-aptdaemon to implement the stuff needed. Then we can sync this over.
>
> Yes, python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets is rather easy to use
On 24/09/2011 01:59, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 23/09/2011 14:32, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Chow Loong Jin [2011-09-23 3:53 -]:
>>> Ooh, it does? Maybe we could add a Python wrapper script thing that uses
>>> python-aptdaemon to implement the stuff needed. Then we can sync this over.
>>
>> Yes, py
Chow Loong Jin [2011-09-23 3:53 -]:
> Ooh, it does? Maybe we could add a Python wrapper script thing that uses
> python-aptdaemon to implement the stuff needed. Then we can sync this over.
Yes, python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets is rather easy to use (see the demo
script in the aptdaemon source). A
On 23/09/2011 10:20, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
> 2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
>> On 23/09/2011 08:21, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
>>> @hyperair
>>>
>>> 2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together
(and propagate this change to Debian, but there's
2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
> On 23/09/2011 08:21, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
>> @hyperair
>>
>> 2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
>>> I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together
>>> (and propagate this change to Debian, but there's no time for that).
>>
>> I think that shouldn't merg
On 23/09/2011 08:21, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
> @hyperair
>
> 2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
>> I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together
>> (and propagate this change to Debian, but there's no time for that).
>
> I think that shouldn't merge synaptic/apturl patch by two rea
@hyperair
2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin :
> I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together
> (and propagate this change to Debian, but there's no time for that).
I think that shouldn't merge synaptic/apturl patch by two reasons.
First, Ubuntu dropped synaptic from desktop task,
I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together
(and propagate this change to Debian, but there's no time for that).
I'll take a closer look tomorrow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Hmm, they seem to be done in separate steps. This is a step down from
Synaptic, but I'm sure apturl can be improved for this in the future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840292
Title:
Tried to create package switching to apturl (not use aptd directly).
https://code.launchpad.net/~cosmos-door/ubuntu/oneiric/nautilus-share/fix-840292/
It works. But install step becomes awkward, because apturl couldn't
install multiple package at once.
I uploaded PPA too, now building. Could you
** Branch linked: lp:~cosmos-door/ubuntu/oneiric/nautilus-
share/fix-840292
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840292
Title:
uses synaptic to install samba which is not on the CD
To mana
21 matches
Mail list logo