Thamks for the update. I'm rejecting this as not a bug in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: apt-file (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Emmet Hikory => (unassigned)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
Bash completions file is not syntactically valid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84650
You received this bug n
The changes which resolved this issue for me were to software not
packaged in Ubuntu. I don't think there is an issue here to be fixed in
Ubuntu.
--
Bash completions file is not syntactically valid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84650
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Would you please attach a patch of your local changes to this bug? It's
hard to determine how to fix this for everyone with the available
comments. Thank you.
** Changed in: apt-file (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Emmet Hikory
--
Bash completions file is not syntactically valid
https:
Code independent of apt-file and bash was invoking /bin/sh on a script
which sourced /etc/bash_completions, so I don't think either of those
packages is at fault here. I've fixed this locally (to use /bin/bash
instead) in the offending code and don't see the problem anymore.
--
Bash completions
Where did /bin/sh get involved is the package distributed with /bin/sh
if so maybe it needs to be updated to point to /bin/bash.
--
Bash completions file is not syntactically valid
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84650
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
On further investigation, it looks like /bin/sh got involved somewhere.
It doesn't like -s in function names, but bash itself is happy with
them. I guess this bug is invalid.
--
Bash completions file is not syntactically valid
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84650
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
