Problem with the user accounts and libglib2.0 libraries in version
0.3-ubuntu4 - after update oneiric. ADM Architecture. The libraries are
not left libglib2.0 reinstall. I think the bug should be reopened
because the problem is back with version 0.3 ubuntu4.
--
You received this bug notification
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Steve Langasek
steve.langa...@canonical.com wrote:
Please show 'ls -ld /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0*'. I'm pretty sure one of
the directories is wrongly symlinked to the other, which means that
unpacking libglib2.0-data after libglib2.0-0 *overwrites* the
Steve Langasek [2011-09-30 5:37 -]:
So glib2.0 needs to clean up its historic mis-migration.
Hmm, the preinst files do
if [ $1 = upgrade ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 2.27.5-2; then
rm -f /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0-dev
fi
I. e. correctly use lt-nl (thus don't fire on fresh
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Michael Nelson
michael.nel...@canonical.com wrote:
Not that I'm aware of (see below), but it is possible that I've sudo'd
a symlink at some point - I don't remember doing so, and don't see why
I would have (we do most our dev work in a virtualenv), but I guess
Hey Michael.
I see this as well and we got some dupes, I think this is something
real. Feel free to clean it up manually of course to get your box
working again, but I think this bug is very real.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
To manage notifications about
This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.30.0-0ubuntu3
---
glib2.0 (2.30.0-0ubuntu3) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/libglib2.0-data.preinst:
- fix upgrade issue caused by a leftover symlink (LP: #854622)
-- Michael Vogt michael.v...@ubuntu.com Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:21:42
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/glib/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: rls-mgr-o-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Please show 'ls -ld /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0*'. I'm pretty sure one of
the directories is wrongly symlinked to the other, which means that
unpacking libglib2.0-data after libglib2.0-0 *overwrites* the
libglib2.0-0 changelog /on the filesystem/.
This is a classic botched symlink-directory
Steve Langasek [2011-09-30 1:39 -]:
This is a classic botched symlink-directory migration in a package.
For sure, but neither the natty nor the recent oneiric versions
actually shipped any symlinks, and I'm fairly sure we didn't introduce
them at any time during oneiric.
--
You received
and I'm fairly sure we didn't introduce
them at any time during oneiric.
No, we introduced *multiarch* in oneiric, so now the system cares a lot
more about file integrity.
So glib2.0 needs to clean up its historic mis-migration.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status:
I downloaded the i386 and amd64 binaries from that version from
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.29.92-0ubuntu1/+build/2793297
and
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.29.92-0ubuntu1/+build/2793299.
They both have an identical changelog.Debian.gz, so I'm not sure where
the
I tried to reproduce this by booting a natty live system, manually
enabling multiarch (/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch), and upgrading to
oneiric's libc6, libglib2.0-*, and then installing libglib2.0-0:i386.
These steps all worked fine, and changelog.Debian.gz for all glib2.0
binaries were intact
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In such a situation, could you please give me the output of
ls -l /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
dpkg -S /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
$ ls -l
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks. This is certainly the inexplicable part:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2011-09-20 10:02
/usr/share/doc/libglib2.0-bin/changelog.Debian.gz -
../libglib2.0-0/changelog.Debian.gz
but then again that's just -bin, not the actual package which caused
trouble. The other dpkg -S /ls -l output looks
Some info, glib was upgraded on amd64 (native arch):
libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.28.6-0ubuntu1, 2.29.92-0ubuntu1),
and a new install on i386:
libglib2.0-0:i386 (2.29.92-0ubuntu1, automatic)
When michael runs md5sum -c /var/lib/dpkg/info/libglib2.0-0.debsums the
changelogs.Debian.gz fails to verify.
Thanks for this additional file. This is interessting data. The md5sum of it is:
ce002095400b45d6a0a93bb03f065edf changelog.Debian.gz
But your .md5sum file expects:
680a0ae504d012f2e27adbc2def2c707 usr/share/doc/libglib2.0-0/changelog.Debian.gz
With a changelog from my system:
$ md5sum
** Attachment added: The file failing the checksum.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/854622/+attachment/2445474/+files/libglib2.0-0%3Aamd64.md5sums
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: changelog.Debian.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/854622/+attachment/2445515/+files/changelog.Debian.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Unpack order again:
...
Preparing to replace libglib2.0-bin 2.28.6-0ubuntu1 (using
.../libglib2.0-bin_2.29.92-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libglib2.0-bin ...
Preparing to replace bamfdaemon 0.2.90-0ubuntu3 (using
.../bamfdaemon_0.2.98-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking
Note that I can not reproduce this in a chroot when installing
libglib2.0-0 and 2.0-data oneiric nor when upgrading such a chroot from
natty.
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed
Fwiw, I tried to reproduce this issue using apt-clone and the system
state file, but it did not work out, I could not hit this failure
condition.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Michael Vogt michael.v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Fwiw, I tried to reproduce this issue using apt-clone and the system
state file, but it did not work out, I could not hit this failure
condition.
Thanks Michael. Here's the output of trying to update:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Similar to bug 835625
For reference: bug 827950, #839909 and #839744 shows the same error with
libglib2.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
27 matches
Mail list logo
