[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862785
Obrouni, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any
activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If
so, could you please test for this with the latest development release
of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: linux-ports-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862785
** Package changed: linux-ports-meta (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862785
Title:
Default sampling_down_factor setting for ondemand governor cripples
im looking into a possible work around by adding the tunable setting
into /etc/init.d/ondemand
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862785
Title:
Default sampling_down_factor setting for
I can comment on this. First off, sampling_down_factor = 1 disables the
feature, so it is a bit the opposite of what you describe. I believe
what's happening is that ondemand can fail for certain cpu's (including
mine), and instead of amping up the frequency under heavy load, it will
resonate
