[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-09 Thread Christian Hilberg
With the backported libgdata13 (0.10.1-1) preinstalled, all of the packages mentioned above and their dependencies installed fine in an up- to-date Oneiric VirtualBox image. I do not have a native installation to test with. Results --- totem: Searching for YouTube videos works (this uses

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-09 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from backporters. Thanks for testing, Christian. ** Changed in: libgdata (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-08 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Christian, libgdata 0.10 is in Precise now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-08 Thread Christian Hilberg
Thanks. Looks good so far for Oneiric. I've done the following: * from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgdata13, get libgdata_0.10.1-1.dsc, libgdata_0.10.1.orig.tar.xz, libgdata_0.10.1-1.debian.tar.gz * using pbuilder on Oneiric and the vanilla files above (no changes needed), build the

Re: [Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-08 Thread Evan Broder
Can you please test that the following reverse dependencies, as released with oneiric, of libgdata13 still work with the backported gdata? * totem-plugins * eog-plugins * evolution-data-server * evolution That should be all that's necessary now. Once you've done that, change the state of the

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-03 Thread Christian Hilberg
Ok thanks, will keep an eye on it. As soon as libgdata is bumped to = 0.10 in Precise, I'll act on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For Ubuntu Backports, we only backport packages from within the Ubuntu archive. Since libgdata in Precise is still at 0.9, there's nothing for us to backport. I would expect (but don't know) that the desktop team would be looking to upload the new libgdata to the archive soon. For our tracking

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
FWIW, putting 0.10(.1) into oneiric-backports would be perfectly fine for me. Kind regards, Christian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-10-20 Thread Ilya Barygin
** Also affects: oneiric-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric To

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-10-20 Thread Ilya Barygin
** Changed in: libgdata (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric To manage