This bug was fixed in the package egenix-mx-base - 3.2.1-1~oneiric0.1
---
egenix-mx-base (3.2.1-1~oneiric0.1) oneiric-proposed; urgency=low
* Backport to Oneiric as an SRU to fix segfault. (LP: #884619)
* No other source changes required.
egenix-mx-base (3.2.1-1) unstable; urgenc
-proposed package downloaded, installed and tested. Works as expected.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619
Title
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/egenix-mx-base
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619
Title:
Segfault with comparison to None
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Hello Daniele, or anyone else affected,
Accepted egenix-mx-base into oneiric-proposed. The package will build
now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
We are taking a different route. We're going to have 3.2.1 added to
oneiric-updates, per the SRU (Stable Release Update) method. Broder,
who's a MOTU and a person who has some say, is sponsoring the SRU,
which gives it a very good chance of being updated.
See the update i put to your response, a
Daniele, this is being taken care of, its closed against the project
because 3.2.1 - 3.2.3 fix the code. The SRU will update oneiric's
package of egenix-mx-base though with the 3.2.1 code, via the oneiric-
updates directory. I emailed you regarding this as well, to clarify
what we're doing with t
If still relevant, I've tested Thomas' backport (https://launchpad.net
/~trekcaptainusa-tw/+archive/egenix-mx-base) and it works as expected
both with i386 and IA64 architectures. I've tested both this bug's test
case and compiled and executed the psycopg2 test suite with mx support.
--
You recei
[SRU]
[Impact]
Frequency of the bug is rare, or under certain cases as described in this bug.
In Oneiric, anything using egenix-mx-base for mx.DateTime is vulnerable to this
occurrence.
[Development Fix]
This bug was filed to the upstream source, and was fixed with the release of
3.2.1 to Deb
To clarify above, I chose to update to 3.2.1 not because it's difficult
to isolate the relevant patch, but because all of the changes in the
3.2.1 release fix bugs in the code.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
This has already been fixed in the 3.2.1 upstream release, currently in
Precise as 3.2.1-1, so I'm closing the bug against the development
release.
I've gone ahead and uploaded an microrelease update of 3.2.1 to oneiric-
proposed. Somebody from the SRU team should be through to review the
SRU. In
** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619
Title:
Segfault with comparison to None
To manage n
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619
Title:
Segfault with comparison to None
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+b
12 matches
Mail list logo
