** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/raring-proposed/splix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898986
Title:
Printing does not work on Samsung CLP-610ND
To manage notifications about this bug go t
@Johann, thank you for that pointer. I had tried the official Samsung
driver earlier which has the world's worst installer and on printed to
half the page width.
Using the latest driver from bchemnet I found the following:
* Using the Samsung Configurator meant no print jobs came out and I was
For immediate help: I use Samsung CLP610 and 620 reliably since 2+ years
with this solution:
http://www.bchemnet.com/suldr/
No problem whatsoever.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898986
I just tried again with a fresh install of Precise with my 620ND. By
default the foomatic driver is picked and it defaults to monochrome. I
tried printing this bug page as my test. I don't know if the blame is
with Chrome or the driver, but it behaves as though the top and bottom
margins are 0 b
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/splix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898986
Title:
Printing does not work on Samsung CLP-610ND
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
I get the ghostscript error every time I try to print the test page with
the foomatic driver in color. There are no line containing "audit" in
the syslog (except two "profile_replace" ten minutes earlier when I
changed some settings). I attach another cups error_log with debug log-
level.
** Atta
The CLP-620(ND) does not have a SpliX PPD, so there is nothing to
remove.
For using the foo2qpdl driver please follow the instructions of comment
#22 and tell whether this helps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
The exact same problems occur with the CLP-620ND. (I bought one
replacing the 610 hoping it was fixed - sadly not.)
Consequently the 620 should also be removed. I'm happy to run any
additional tests you want to confirm this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/splix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898986
Title:
Printing does not work on Samsung CLP-610ND
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
This bug was fixed in the package splix - 2.0.0+svn300-1.1ubuntu2
---
splix (2.0.0+svn300-1.1ubuntu2) precise; urgency=low
* debian/rules: Removed PPD files for the Samsung CLP-610 and CLP-610ND,
these printers do not work with SpliX (LP: #898986).
-- Till KamppeterTue, 6
In bug 936629 a user reports that the problem described there occurs for
him with the foo2qpdl driver. Perhaps you also suffer the problem of bug
936629 at least when you are using foo2qpdl. Please check for lines
containing "audit" in /var/log/syslog and try to print again (with all
drivers) after
I cannot reproduce the Ghostscript error when using the foo2qpdl driver.
Does it happen on all your attempts to print with this driver? If it
does not happen, does the file get printed then?
The printed error message in comment #14 makes the impression that SpliX
has a bug upstream that prevents f
For completeness, I add the files /var/spool/cups that are generated
when trying to print using the splix driver for the CLP-610
** Attachment added: "d00051-001"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/splix/+bug/898986/+attachment/2749322/+files/d00051-001
--
You received this bug notifi
** Attachment added: "c00051"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/splix/+bug/898986/+attachment/2749321/+files/c00051
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898986
Title:
Printing d
As the Job 42 in the logfile attached to comment 14 and the logfile in
comment 15 show, there is another bug in the splix driver for this
printer. I'm setting the bug to confirmed for both packages as Rober
Binns and me have independently observed the same behaviour.
--
You received this bug noti
15 matches
Mail list logo
