*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 817656 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817656
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 817656
[FFE] Please merge couchdb 1.1.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Added new debdiff for couchdb_1.2.0-1 = couchdb_1.2.0-1ubuntu1
** Patch added: couchdb_1.2.0-1_to_couchdb_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/903098/+attachment/3227271/+files/couchdb_1.2.0-1_to_couchdb_1.2.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this
Okay, I'm attempting this again, this time with CouchDB 1.2.0 aiming for
Quantal.
I'm not sure what the best practice is here: should I update this bug
title, or work from a new bug? I filed a new bug, but I'll mark it as a
duplicate if needed:
Evan: no, haven't make any progress on this and unfortunately I wont
have any time to for at least few weeks. However, I did confirm that
the init.d script is working fine under Oneiric, for both the current
Ubuntu version and my proposed version. I'm not sure why this is, but I
guess it helps
It was replication across a longhaul link. It seems to be working now,
but it didn't work the first handful of time I tried it. Just timed
out with no good errors in the logs.
I have not tried continuous replication, but I plan to.
Thanks,
-Ben
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Jason Gerard
I was able to replicate between identical versions of couchdb on
identical versions of Ubuntu. Don't know what was going on the first
time, but I've been able to do it several times now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Jason: Have you made any progress on fixing the initscript? Also, at
this point we really need to get a FFe for this change. Could you fill
one out? (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess lists the
information that the release team will want to see - feel free to
subscribe me to the new
Evan,
couchdb now Replaces couchdb-bin (= 1.0.1-0ubuntu18). I tested the
upgrade with the 1.0.1 couchdb and couchdb-bin packages installed, and
the upgrade works without triggering a conffile conflict.
I attached an updated debdiff. Thanks again for the review!
** Patch added:
Evan,
Also, I was pretty darn careful testing the upgrade before too, so
unless I missed an important permutation, it wasn't triggering a
conffile conflict before the Replaces was added... or I just missed it.
Anyway, I guess the important thing is it isn't triggering it now with
what (might) be
Errr! Okay, one issue I just found, this is broken:
sudo /etc/init.d/couchdb stop
It's broken for both the version currently in Precise and my proposed
version here.
In 1.0.1, `/etc/init.d/couchdb stop` says it fails and doesn't kill
couchdb.
In my 1.1.1 package, `/etc/init.d/couchdb stop`
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: couchdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Perhaps worth noting here that couchdb replication is broken with the
current packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from
Benjamin - broken in what way? Overall I've had decent luck replicating
with this version... in what scenario do you consider it broken? Do you
happen to have links to upstream bugs that might be involved?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Evan,
Thanks for reviewing this! I'll add the Replaces and test out the conf
file upgrade ASAP.
Sorry, I didn't know about debdif, thought I was doing this the
appropriate Ubuntu way.
Yeah, the config file situation is a bit screwy. Moving local.ini and
local.d into couchdb-bin might be a bit
Hi Jason -
In the future, I'd strongly encourage falling back to debdiffs instead
of bzr branches when you run into this much trouble getting the bzr MPs
to do what you want. I don't want to blame you for the tardiness of the
review here - that's clearly a failure of the development and
Oh yeah - and because the merge proposal just makes my eyes bleed, I'm
going to go ahead and attach the debdiff from Debian here and reject the
MP. The useful discussion is here and not on the MP, and the MP doesn't
accurately represent the patch anyway.
** Patch added:
After quite a lot of testing, I feel that it's reasonable to push both
my proposed couchdb 1.1.1 package and a fixed desktopcouch package out
to the Novacut Stable PPA, for both Precise and Oneiric. This should
get these proposed changes quite a lot of testing and hopefully help
move this
Okay, after fixing a packaging foobar I made that broke the build on
amd64, I now have packages available for testing in the Novacut Daily
Builds PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~novacut/+archive/daily?field.series_filter=precise
It's currently building for Oneiric also, to help get wider testing.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #573061
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573061
** Also affects: couchdb (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573061
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: couchdb (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
To manage
It's usuall the other way around. Debian spliting packages in many, and
Ubuntu want one large, like for wine.
So, an open discussion, where thechnical merits is most important and
good patches to Debians package prob. will make Debian and Ubuntu
packages look mostly the same.
Keep up the good
For reference, here is the debian/changelog bits I added:
couchdb (1.1.1-1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
* Started with branch of 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
* Split into `couchdb-bin` and `couchdb` packages as found in Ubuntu, with
goal of keeping delta between Debian and Ubuntu as low
Makes a ton of sense to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
It looks like your branch has a ton of conflicts in the merge proposal.
But I think the best solution is to get the packaging updated in debian,
and not have any ubuntu-specific changes in here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
@dobey - I'm not sure what's the right and proper way to do this VCS-
wise, but what I'm proposing is a sync from Debian plus a small delta.
It makes more sense looking at this as a merge into
lp:debian/wheezy/couchdb :
https://code.launchpad.net/~jderose/ubuntu/precise/couchdb/1.1.1-low-
You can't merge into the Debian VCS branches, you can only merge from
them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
@micahg - gotcha, thanks! I guess it still illustrates the low-delta
from Debian.
So what's the correct way for me to propose this sync/merge? I think
the important thing is that there be a small, understandable delta
between Ubuntu and Debian. I think having a clean history in
That should be One, not Once in the last sentence.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098
Title:
Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
To manage notifications
The large diff from Ubuntu - Ubuntu is fine given that we're going from
1.0.1 to 1.1.0, the uploader should just verify the Debian - Ubuntu
diff is actually minimal. Once could also run filterdiff on the Ubuntu
- Ubuntu diff, limiting to the debian dir, to make sure any needed
changes are not
Even the diff of just debian/ from precise to wheezy or my proposal is
25k lines as so many cherry-picked patches are being carried (some of
which are crazy big... most of that 25k is one patch). So not an easy
thing to make sense of.
Aside from the cherry-picking so Ubuntu could continue to
30 matches
Mail list logo
