*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 28479 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479
we have icedtea-java7 package in gutsy which also has a 64bit package.
This should work well for almost anybody.
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 28479 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479
Dear Alexander,
May I please paint a picture for you (one that ubuntu really aims to achieve).
A school for which I am setting up an LTSP installation has Large Xeon systems
with 8GB RAM each.
Thus no 32bit di
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 28479 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 28479
firefox32 for amd64 => support 32-bit plugins on amd64
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9094
this is in progress as we are working on a way to tightly integrate
nspluginwrapper. See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxNspluginwrapperSpec
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://bugs.launchpa
What will it take to convince you of my rational? (Or the other way around...)
Will it be appropriate to take this kind of the conversation off list? (via
ICQ/msn/yahoo/gtalk/etc.)
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90947
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:18:49PM -, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for adding this to the wishlist.
> And on that manner, who should I try to convince that this is something
> highly desirable?
>
At best the plugin providers :) ... otherwise me.
- Alexander
--
[wontfix] firefox
Hi,
Thanks for adding this to the wishlist.
And on that manner, who should I try to convince that this is something highly
desirable?
- Noam
--
[wontfix] firefox should be 32bit even on 64bit enabled OS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90947
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
