** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Ok thanks. Could their be a note on that on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ? Because I tried to
follow the process and add the motu-uvf as explained...
--
UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Unsubscribing motu-uvf; this is a restricted package, and the kernel
team (not motu-uvf) cares for it.
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU UVF Team => (unassigned)
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Is it necessary to have packages handy and ready for upload even for
binary packages that affect the restricted-modules ?
--
UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
** Attachment added: "Attached a diffstat from ATI provided install packages."
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6722145/diffstat.txt
--
UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU UVF Team
--
UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
