[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-20 Thread Hernando Torque
** Changed in: indicator-application Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-14 Thread sbte
** Changed in: indicator-application Assignee: sbte (sbte) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Assignee: sbte (sbte) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: indicator-application Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu)

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Seems fixed in 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 (more precisely, with revision 72: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/indicator- application/precise/revision/72). Valgrind from one hour: ==26238== LEAK SUMMARY: ==26238==definitely lost: 208 bytes in 25 blocks ==26238==indirectly

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-12 Thread Hernando Torque
Oops, forgot the attachment. ** Attachment added: indicator-application.valgrind https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-application/+bug/930291/+attachment/2858593/+files/indicator-application.valgrind -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-04 Thread Hernando Torque
The biggest one is still the same ==7902== 9,926,465 (737,712 direct, 9,188,753 indirect) bytes in 10,246 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,562 of 1,562 ==7902==at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==7902==by 0x5A6ABC8: g_malloc

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-03-03 Thread charles
Hernando, could you attach a new valgrind log from 0.4.91 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291 Title: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h) To manage

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-17 Thread Hernando Torque
A leak was fixed, unfortunately not this one yet. :-) ** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/indicator-application -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291 Title: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h) To manage notifications about

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package indicator-application - 0.4.91-0ubuntu1 --- indicator-application (0.4.91-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Unref approval data after use (lp: #930291) -- Ted Gould t...@ubuntu.com Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:08:30 -0600 **

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-13 Thread Ted Gould
It seems like the biggest leak there is coming from a GDBus message. Probably one getting created that we're either keeping a ref when we shouldn't or not unref'ing when we should. I looked through the code and didn't see anything. But, I thought I'd leave a comment for the next person :-/

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-13 Thread sbte
Oh, apparently I opened the wrong valgrind log when I looked into this. I was looking at a log where it was leaking a GVariant. Thanks for pointing that out Ted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-11 Thread sbte
** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = sbte (sbte) ** Branch linked: lp:~sbte/indicator-application/fix-memory-leak -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-11 Thread Omer Akram
** Also affects: indicator-application Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: indicator-application Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: indicator-application Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: indicator-application Assignee: (unassigned) = sbte

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-10 Thread Hernando Torque
** Attachment added: valgrind.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291/+attachment/2729942/+files/valgrind.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291 Title:

[Bug 930291] Re: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)

2012-02-10 Thread Omer Akram
** Changed in: indicator-application (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930291 Title: indicator-application-service leaking memory (~10 MiB/h)