fontconfig (2.8.0-3ubuntu5) precise; urgency=low
* debian/patches/01_fonts_nanum.patch: Fix typo, thanks Felix Geyer for
spotting!
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Appears when running ubuntu-bug.
~$ ubuntu-bug python
Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf", line 169: not
well-formed (invalid token)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93
** Tags added: qa-manual-testing
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Yes, 01_fonts_nanum.patch introduced that small syntax error.
Attaching a debdiff:
fontconfig (2.8.0-3ubuntu5) precise; urgency=low
* 01_fonts_nanum.patch: Fix syntax error in 65-nonlatin.conf. (LP:
#931295)
-- Felix Geyer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:26:21 +0100
** Patch added: "fontconfig_2.8.0
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931295
Title:
** Description changed:
Precise i386, logged as gnome-classic
Received & applied this update and get this error into the install
dialog box:
-
Updating fontconfig cache for /usr/share/fonts/truetype/wqy
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/unifont /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-lucida
/usr/sh
