*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1017001 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017001
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1017001
package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
pre-dependency problem - not installing resolvconf
--
You received this b
Attached is apt clone data from duplicate bug 989436.
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/937196/+attachment/3205719/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification beca
this is probably the same bug as bug #1017001.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937196
Title:
10.04 LTS -> 12.04 upgrade failed: ifupdown depends on upstart and
initscripts but they a
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937196
Title:
We believe this to be a bug in the package manager, rather than in
ifupdown. The circular dependency between ifupdown/upstart/initscripts
is not ideal, but the package manager is supposed to be able to handle
this.
** Package changed: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise) => apt (Ubuntu Precise)
** Changed
** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: High
Assignee: Stéphane Graber (stgraber)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
For the record, I did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade before the
release upgrade.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937196
Title:
10.04 LTS -> 12.04 upgrade failed: ifupdown depends
Changing back to confirmed for the following reasons:
1) people are still seeing it (and not just on 10.04, apparently)
2) people might not update their 10.04 install before doing the upgrade
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notifi
Just tried an update from Ubuntu server 10.04 to 12.04 using the "sudo
do-release-upgrade -d" command. Got the same error. As a result the
installation did not succeed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Did update from oneiric. But go the same error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937196
Title:
10.04 LTS -> 12.04 upgrade failed: ifupdown depends on upstart and
initscripts but they
chances are this will not be reproducible with the newest release-
upgrader apt that's landed in lucid. Leaving it open in case anyone
else runs into it, but marking incomplete.
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
2012-02-20 09:17:27,749 INFO apt version: '0.8.16~exp12ubuntu1~upgrader1'
2012-02-20 09:17:27,749 INFO release-upgrader version '0.156.5' started
Not sure if that version has all the fixes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
When I got this to happen, I did a fresh Mythbuntu 10.04.1 install and
did not do the megaload of updates before issuing "do-release-upgrade
-d"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937196
Ti
I don't know why this is not reproducible, but I certainly see a
circular relationship that can be contributing to it
Package: upstart
Depends: ifupdown (>= 0.6.10ubuntu5) # newer than lucid
Package: ifupdown
Depends: upstart-job
Package: friendly-recovery
Breaks: upstart (<< 1.3-0ub
Upgrading on my system, I see a similar sequence:
(Reading database ... ^M(Reading database ... 5%^M(Reading database ...
10%^M(Reading database ... 15%^M(Reading database ... 20%^M(Reading database
... 25%^M(Reading database ... 30%^M(Reading database ... 35%^M(Reading
database ... 40%^M
Prepar
Subscribing Michael Vogt as I don't have a clear idea of what's
happening there (especially as all the other lts-to-lts upgrade tests
seem to work fine).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
I can't reproduce here, here's the relevant section of the log:
(Reading database ... 92517 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 (using
.../initramfs-tools_0.99ubuntu10_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: considerin
Oh, worth noting that I'm running the same apt and update-manager as the
reporter (looking at main.log) and that's the latest backported one
available in Lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I'll have a look at this, trying to upgrade a minimal 10.04 system to 12.04 and
see if I can reproduce.
As far as I can remember, I haven't changed any of the ifupdown dependencies
lately so I'm a bit surprised this appears now.
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Foundatio
19 matches
Mail list logo
