[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

This bug was fixed in the package sysvinit - 2.87dsf-4ubuntu1 --- sysvinit (2.87dsf-4ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: - Support Cell processor: + debian/initscripts/postinst: Create spu system group and /spu mount point

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

Unsubscribed Ubuntu Sponsors for main from this bug for now. -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

Re: [Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

I'm not aware of the package existing in Ubuntu, but anyway, AFAIK it's not working in Ubuntu. So whoever has it working must have put it there themselves and thus know how to configure their install. Doesn't this belong in the bootlogd package anyway? On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Scott James

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

There are definitely people who have it working in Ubuntu - removing files would break it for them -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

So would I, but it's been asked for for years now, and it's an important feature, and I'm led to believe the solution is quite nontrivial. It might even be “solved” by replacing bootlogd with something different. So rather than having these files installed uselessly on several thousand computers fo

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

I'd rather the patch found a way to make bootlogd work again -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

Scott: can you take a look at it? -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://list

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

The attached debdiff moves the init.d scripts related to bootlogd in the obsolete directory of the package, thus making them non-instalable. This is because bootlogd has not been installed in Ubuntu since longtime ago. (The "obsolete" directory already existed, it contains some older files. If we

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

To get your fix included in Ubuntu, try transforming it into a debdiff (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff) and submitting it for review (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess). ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- bootlogd configurati

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

Someone might want to apply this patch to the /etc/init.d/bootlogd file. As the old one, it checks if the daemon exists. However, if it doesn't, it warns the user (the old one failed silently) and points them to this bug report, which is informative enough. There's also a 2 sec delay there (it on

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

/sbin/logd is supposed to log to /var/log/boot, but it's broken, more info at . -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

Is there another way to see the boot message ? -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

Confirmed in Fesity. ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 94120] Re: bootlogd configuration files are misleading

** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: upstart => sysvinit -- bootlogd configuration files are misleading https://launchpad.net/bugs/94120 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs